Model comparison

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 vs Inkling-Small

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 Tencent

38.6

Rank #184 Confirmed

Inkling-Small Thinking Machines Lab

46.5

Rank #63 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher in 0 categories and Inkling-Small in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Inkling-Small leads 48.2 to 35.1.
  • Inkling-Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Inkling-Small specifications
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10Inkling-Small
ProviderTencentThinking Machines Lab
Noometry Index38.646.5
Released—2026-07-15
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—524K
Max output—1.05M
Input $ / M tokens—$0.45
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked1233

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Inkling-Small leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181), Inkling-Small: 43.6 (#85)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Inkling-Small
LMArena Coding13071451
LMArena WebDev—1409
SciCode—48.7%

Reasoning Inkling-Small leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148), Inkling-Small: 38.6 (#63)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Inkling-Small
LMArena Hard Prompts12861423
ARC-AGI-2—40.1%
ARC-AGI-1—84%
CritPt—8.3%
Chess Puzzles—18%
Mystery Game Puzzles—6%
Epoch Capabilities Index—150.15

Math Inkling-Small leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178), Inkling-Small: 45.1 (#77)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Inkling-Small
LMArena Math12811459
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—46.3%
FrontierMath Tier 4—17.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—90%
ProofBench—6%

Knowledge Inkling-Small leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188), Inkling-Small: 48.2 (#77)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Inkling-Small
LMArena Expert12761442
GPQA Diamond—88.5%
SimpleQA Verified—19.1%

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —, Inkling-Small: 39.1 (#62)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Inkling-Small
LMArena Vision—1235

Multilingual Inkling-Small leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200), Inkling-Small: 51.7 (#104)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Inkling-Small
LMArena Non-English12651402
LMArena Chinese13461465
LMArena Russian12661391
LMArena French—1436
LMArena German—1405
LMArena Japanese—1405
LMArena Korean—1363
LMArena Spanish—1428

Instruction Following Inkling-Small leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197), Inkling-Small: 73.8 (#114)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Inkling-Small
LMArena Instruction Following12771399

Long Context Inkling-Small leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149), Inkling-Small: 42.7 (#118)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Inkling-Small
LMArena Longer Query13411401

Writing & Preference Inkling-Small leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197), Inkling-Small: 59.6 (#107)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Inkling-Small
LMArena Text12881414
LMArena Creative Writing12641331
LMArena Multi-Turn12841418
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1491

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better than Inkling-Small?

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 or Inkling-Small better for coding?

Inkling-Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 38.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Inkling-Small share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Inkling-Small has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper