Noometry

Model comparison

Hunyuan Large Vision vs Qwen2.5-Coder-32B

Hunyuan Large Vision is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 32.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Large Vision Tencent

37.0

Rank #198 Confirmed

Qwen2.5-Coder-32B Alibaba (Qwen)

32.9

Rank #239 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large Vision scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Hunyuan Large Vision leads 37.6 to 22.4.
  • Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Large VisionQwen2.5-Coder-32B
ProviderTencentAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index37.032.9
Released—2024-09-18
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—33K
Max output—29K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.66
Output $ / M tokens—$1
Results tracked1331

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 37.6 (#176), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 22.4 (#328)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Coding13071276
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—9%
Aider Polyglot—16.4%
BigCodeBench Instruct—49%
LiveBench Coding—56.9%
BigCodeBench Complete—58%
HumanEval+—87.2%
MBPP+—77%

Reasoning Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 23.8 (#160), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 20.4 (#220)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Hard Prompts12571251
LiveBench Reasoning—42.1%
LiveBench Data Analysis—49.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—119.41
HellaSwag—83%
LiveBench—46.2%
WinoGrande—80.8%

Math Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 32.8 (#184), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 30.8 (#203)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Math12691251
LiveBench Math—46.6%
GSM8K—93%

Knowledge Too close to call

Hunyuan Large Vision: 33.7 (#191), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 32.9 (#200)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Expert12501221
ARC (AI2) Challenge—70.5%
MMLU—79.1%

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.1 (#79), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: —

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Vision1180—

Multilingual Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 40.1 (#216), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 38.0 (#230)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Non-English12361205
LMArena Chinese12891222
LMArena Russian12431228

Instruction Following Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 66.0 (#210), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 61.6 (#240)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Instruction Following12501223
LiveBench Instruction Following—58.7%

Long Context Too close to call

Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.8 (#184), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 37.9 (#204)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Longer Query12791251

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.7 (#211), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 41.8 (#235)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Text12631230
LMArena Creative Writing12501174
LMArena Multi-Turn12531222
LiveBench Language—23.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Large Vision better than Qwen2.5-Coder-32B?

Hunyuan Large Vision is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 32.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Large Vision or Qwen2.5-Coder-32B better for coding?

Hunyuan Large Vision scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 22.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large Vision and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large Vision has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has 31.

Related comparisons

Go deeper