Model comparison
Hunyuan Large Vision vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Hunyuan Large Vision is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Large Vision leads 35.5 to 12.6.
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.6 | 29.0 |
| Released | — | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.17 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.3 (#180), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 36.5 (#208)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1308 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 46.1% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan Large Vision: —, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 23.8 (#124)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 7.8% |
Reasoning Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 24.8 (#158), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 14.8 (#322)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1257 | — |
| DTBench | — | 47.7% |
| LMCA | — | 6.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.51 |
Math Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.5 (#183), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 12.6 (#306)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.5% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1268 | — |
Knowledge Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 34.4 (#196), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 17.0 (#286)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 35.5% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 53.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 34.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1252 | — |
| MMLU | — | 72.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.7 (#83), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1180 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hunyuan Large Vision: 39.9 (#221), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1236 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1287 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1243 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 65.8 (#215), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 63.2 (#231)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 74.1% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1251 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.9 (#189), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1280 | — |
Writing & Preference Qwen2.5 7B Instruct leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.5 (#218), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 48.8 (#195)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1263 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1248 | — |
| WildBench | — | 73.1% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1254 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Large Vision better than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?
Hunyuan Large Vision is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Large Vision or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct better for coding?
Hunyuan Large Vision scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.3 versus 36.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large Vision and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large Vision has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has 15.