Model comparison

Hunyuan Large Vision vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large Vision scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 50.4 to 46.7.
  • Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Large Vision and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct specifications
Hunyuan Large VisionOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
ProviderTencentAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index37.038.8
Released——
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1316

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 37.6 (#176), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 38.9 (#154)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding13071346

Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 23.8 (#160), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 25.4 (#131)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts12571322

Math Too close to call

Hunyuan Large Vision: 32.8 (#184), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 33.6 (#169)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Math12691305

Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 33.7 (#191), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 35.4 (#175)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Expert12501307

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.1 (#79), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Vision1180—

Multilingual Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 40.1 (#216), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.8 (#185)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English12361275
LMArena Chinese12891304
LMArena Russian12431268
LMArena French—1328
LMArena German—1283
LMArena Korean—1206
LMArena Spanish—1337

Instruction Following Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 66.0 (#210), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.8 (#182)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following12501298

Long Context Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.8 (#184), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#161)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query12791312

Writing & Preference Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.7 (#211), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.4 (#179)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Text12631311
LMArena Creative Writing12501264
LMArena Multi-Turn12531309

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Large Vision better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Large Vision or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large Vision and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large Vision has 13 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper