Model comparison

Hunyuan Large Vision vs MiniMax-M3

MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Large Vision Tencent

37.0

Rank #198 Confirmed

MiniMax-M3 MiniMax

43.5

Rank #81 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large Vision scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax-M3 in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiniMax-M3 leads 58.4 to 33.7.
  • MiniMax-M3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Large Vision and MiniMax-M3 specifications
Hunyuan Large VisionMiniMax-M3
ProviderTencentMiniMax
Noometry Index37.043.5
Released—2026-06-01
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1M
Max output—512K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked1341

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M3 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 37.6 (#176), MiniMax-M3: 41.5 (#111)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMiniMax-M3
LMArena Coding13071470
FrontierCode—14.7%
LMArena WebDev—1482
SciCode—47.1%
ALE-Bench—640.02

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Large Vision: —, MiniMax-M3: 22.5 (#121)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMiniMax-M3
APEX-Agents—37.7%
OSWorld 2.0—4.6%
GBAEval—0.9%
Vending-Bench 2—2,158

Reasoning MiniMax-M3 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 23.8 (#160), MiniMax-M3: 29.3 (#83)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMiniMax-M3
LMArena Hard Prompts12571447
SimpleBench—45.8%
NYT Connections (extended)—65.1%
CritPt—3.7%
Chess Puzzles—14%
Mystery Game Puzzles—8%
DTBench—78.9%
LMCA—33.7%
Surface Evolver Bench—55%
Epoch Capabilities Index—147
ForecastBench—61.4

Math MiniMax-M3 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 32.8 (#184), MiniMax-M3: 39.1 (#83)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMiniMax-M3
LMArena Math12691432
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—71.1%
ProofBench—18%

Knowledge MiniMax-M3 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 33.7 (#191), MiniMax-M3: 58.4 (#32)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMiniMax-M3
LMArena Expert12501462
GPQA Diamond—90.9%

Multimodal MiniMax-M3 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.1 (#79), MiniMax-M3: 39.5 (#45)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMiniMax-M3
LMArena Vision11801254
LMArena Document—1435

Multilingual MiniMax-M3 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 40.1 (#216), MiniMax-M3: 53.2 (#70)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMiniMax-M3
LMArena Non-English12361420
LMArena Chinese12891465
LMArena Russian12431430
LMArena French—1445
LMArena German—1424
LMArena Japanese—1381
LMArena Korean—1372
LMArena Spanish—1431

Instruction Following MiniMax-M3 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 66.0 (#210), MiniMax-M3: 75.7 (#56)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMiniMax-M3
LMArena Instruction Following12501433

Long Context MiniMax-M3 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.8 (#184), MiniMax-M3: 44.2 (#68)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMiniMax-M3
LMArena Longer Query12791445

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M3 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.7 (#211), MiniMax-M3: 62.3 (#79)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMiniMax-M3
LMArena Text12631433
LMArena Creative Writing12501405
LMArena Multi-Turn12531441
EQ-Bench 4—1150

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Large Vision better than MiniMax-M3?

MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Large Vision or MiniMax-M3 better for coding?

MiniMax-M3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.5 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large Vision and MiniMax-M3 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large Vision has 13 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M3 has 41.

Related comparisons

Go deeper