Model comparison
Hunyuan Large Vision vs Llama 3.2 1B
Hunyuan Large Vision is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 20.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
MetaSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large Vision scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 3.2 1B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Hunyuan Large Vision leads 34.4 to 7.2.
- Llama 3.2 1B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Large Vision | Llama 3.2 1B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 37.6 | 20.1 |
| Released | — | 2024-09-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 60K |
| Max output | — | 54K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.027 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.3 (#180), Llama 3.2 1B: 21.1 (#338)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1308 | 1070 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 8.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 11.3% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan Large Vision: —, Llama 3.2 1B: 14.6 (#150)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 10.8% |
| BALROG | — | 6.6% |
Reasoning Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 24.8 (#158), Llama 3.2 1B: 16.2 (#308)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1257 | 1044 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 101.99 |
Math Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.5 (#183), Llama 3.2 1B: 10.4 (#313)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1268 | 1086 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 0.6% |
Knowledge Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 34.4 (#196), Llama 3.2 1B: 7.2 (#312)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1252 | 1007 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 23.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.7 (#83), Llama 3.2 1B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1180 | — |
Multilingual Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 39.9 (#221), Llama 3.2 1B: 23.8 (#292)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1236 | 973 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1287 | 959 |
| LMArena Russian | 1243 | 941 |
| LMArena German | — | 1014 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 65.8 (#215), Llama 3.2 1B: 52.4 (#290)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1251 | 1031 |
Long Context Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.9 (#189), Llama 3.2 1B: 31.9 (#274)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1280 | 1050 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.5 (#218), Llama 3.2 1B: 21.3 (#310)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1263 | 1055 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1248 | 1033 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1254 | 1030 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 200 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Large Vision better than Llama 3.2 1B?
Hunyuan Large Vision is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 20.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Large Vision or Llama 3.2 1B better for coding?
Hunyuan Large Vision scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.3 versus 21.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large Vision and Llama 3.2 1B share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large Vision has 13 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 1B has 22.