Model comparison

Grok Build 0.1 vs Step 5 Preview

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.9 to 36.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Grok Build 0.1 xAI

36.4

Rank #216 Reported

Step 5 Preview StepFun

47.9

Rank #58 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok Build 0.1 scores higher in 0 categories and Step 5 Preview in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Step 5 Preview leads 51.8 to 43.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is CritPt: 9.1% for Grok Build 0.1 and 20.9% for Step 5 Preview.
  • Grok Build 0.1 is cheaper at $1 / $2 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $2.70 for Step 5 Preview.
  • Step 5 Preview accepts more context: 1.02M tokens versus 256K.

Side by side

Grok Build 0.1 and Step 5 Preview specifications
Grok Build 0.1Step 5 Preview
ProviderxAIStepFun
Noometry Index36.447.9
Released2026-04-162026-09-16
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window256K1.02M
Max output256K66K
Input $ / M tokens$1$1
Output $ / M tokens$2$2.70
Results tracked318

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 5 Preview leads

Grok Build 0.1: 43.1 (#91), Step 5 Preview: 51.8 (#36)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Step 5 Preview
SciCode50.2%58.9%
LMArena WebDev—1564
LMArena Coding—1480

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: 22.7 (#129), Step 5 Preview: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Step 5 Preview
GBAEval2.4%—

Reasoning Step 5 Preview leads

Grok Build 0.1: 32.2 (#77), Step 5 Preview: 40.0 (#57)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Step 5 Preview
CritPt9.1%20.9%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1465

Math Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, Step 5 Preview: 46.1 (#72)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Step 5 Preview
ProofBench—42%
LMArena Math—1470

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, Step 5 Preview: 41.2 (#112)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Step 5 Preview
LMArena Expert—1470

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, Step 5 Preview: 41.0 (#41)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision—1267

Multilingual Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, Step 5 Preview: 53.8 (#54)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Step 5 Preview
LMArena Non-English—1432
LMArena Chinese—1519
LMArena Russian—1436
LMArena Spanish—1439

Instruction Following Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, Step 5 Preview: 76.0 (#50)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Step 5 Preview
LMArena Instruction Following—1444

Long Context Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, Step 5 Preview: 44.5 (#64)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Step 5 Preview
LMArena Longer Query—1455

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, Step 5 Preview: 62.8 (#71)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text—1442
LMArena Creative Writing—1410
LMArena Multi-Turn—1447

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok Build 0.1 better than Step 5 Preview?

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.9 to 36.4 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Grok Build 0.1 or Step 5 Preview?

Grok Build 0.1 is cheaper. It lists at $1 per million input tokens and $2 per million output tokens; Step 5 Preview lists at $1 and $2.70.

Is Grok Build 0.1 or Step 5 Preview better for coding?

Step 5 Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.8 versus 43.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Step 5 Preview does, with 1.02M tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Grok Build 0.1 and Step 5 Preview share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok Build 0.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Step 5 Preview has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper