Model comparison

Grok Build 0.1 vs Qwen3-4B

Grok Build 0.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.4 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Grok Build 0.1 xAI

36.4

Rank #216 Reported

Qwen3-4B Alibaba (Qwen)

31.9

Rank #264 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok Build 0.1 leads 32.2 to 19.2.
  • Qwen3-4B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok Build 0.1 and Qwen3-4B specifications
Grok Build 0.1Qwen3-4B
ProviderxAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index36.431.9
Released2026-04-162025-04-29
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window256K—
Max output256K—
Input $ / M tokens$1—
Output $ / M tokens$2—
Results tracked36

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: 43.1 (#91), Qwen3-4B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Qwen3-4B
SciCode50.2%—

Agentic & Tool Use Qwen3-4B leads

Grok Build 0.1: 22.7 (#129), Qwen3-4B: 27.6 (#100)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Qwen3-4B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—35.7%
GBAEval2.4%—

Reasoning Grok Build 0.1 leads

Grok Build 0.1: 32.2 (#77), Qwen3-4B: 19.2 (#268)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Qwen3-4B
CritPt9.1%—
Chess Puzzles—4%

Math Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, Qwen3-4B: 29.7 (#240)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Qwen3-4B
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—38.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—52.2%

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#208)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Qwen3-4B
GPQA Diamond—52.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.7%

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok Build 0.1 better than Qwen3-4B?

Grok Build 0.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.4 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Grok Build 0.1 and Qwen3-4B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok Build 0.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper