Model comparison
Grok Build 0.1 vs Qwen1.5-32B
Grok Build 0.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.4 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Grok Build 0.1 leads 43.1 to 31.7.
- Qwen1.5-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen1.5-32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 36.4 | 30.5 |
| Released | 2026-04-16 | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 256K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok Build 0.1 leads
Grok Build 0.1: 43.1 (#91), Qwen1.5-32B: 31.7 (#282)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 50.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.3% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1155 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 42% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: 22.7 (#129), Qwen1.5-32B: —
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | 2.4% | — |
Reasoning Grok Build 0.1 leads
Grok Build 0.1: 32.2 (#77), Qwen1.5-32B: 21.8 (#212)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 9.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1130 |
Math Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Qwen1.5-32B: 33.0 (#207)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1155 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#296)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 30.7% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1126 |
| MMLU | — | 74.4% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Qwen1.5-32B: 31.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1106 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1177 |
| LMArena French | — | 1101 |
| LMArena German | — | 1058 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1027 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1008 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1073 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1089 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Qwen1.5-32B: 57.7 (#265)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1116 |
Long Context Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#246)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1146 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Qwen1.5-32B: 34.2 (#271)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1137 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1140 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok Build 0.1 better than Qwen1.5-32B?
Grok Build 0.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.4 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok Build 0.1 or Qwen1.5-32B better for coding?
Grok Build 0.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.1 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok Build 0.1 and Qwen1.5-32B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok Build 0.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-32B has 21.