Model comparison

Grok Build 0.1 vs Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct

Grok Build 0.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.4 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Grok Build 0.1 xAI

36.4

Rank #216 Reported

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct Microsoft

27.9

Rank #328 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok Build 0.1 leads 32.2 to 14.1.
  • Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok Build 0.1 and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct specifications
Grok Build 0.1Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
ProviderxAIMicrosoft
Noometry Index36.427.9
Released2026-04-162024-04-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window256K—
Max output256K—
Input $ / M tokens$1—
Output $ / M tokens$2—
Results tracked335

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok Build 0.1 leads

Grok Build 0.1: 43.1 (#91), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#323)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
SciCode50.2%—
LiveBench Coding—15.5%
LMArena Coding—1093
HumanEval+—59.1%
MBPP+—54.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: 22.7 (#129), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
GBAEval2.4%—

Reasoning Grok Build 0.1 leads

Grok Build 0.1: 32.2 (#77), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 14.1 (#328)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
CritPt9.1%—
Chess Puzzles—0%
LiveBench Reasoning—26.8%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1072
LiveBench Data Analysis—34.7%
Adversarial NLI—52.8%
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%
HellaSwag—76.7%
LiveBench—22.4%
WinoGrande—70.8%

Math Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#257)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LiveBench Math—15.7%
LMArena Math—1111

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 28.5 (#246)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Expert—1045
ARC (AI2) Challenge—84.9%
MMLU—68.8%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—64%

Multilingual Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.3 (#280)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Non-English—1021
LMArena Chinese—1021
LMArena French—1076
LMArena German—1044
LMArena Japanese—935
LMArena Korean—905
LMArena Russian—1022
LMArena Spanish—1085

Instruction Following Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 47.7 (#303)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LiveBench Instruction Following—39.1%
LMArena Instruction Following—1053

Long Context Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 31.7 (#276)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query—1044

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.6 (#300)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Text—1073
LMArena Creative Writing—1037
LMArena Multi-Turn—1018
LiveBench Language—9.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok Build 0.1 better than Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct?

Grok Build 0.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.4 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok Build 0.1 or Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct better for coding?

Grok Build 0.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.1 versus 26.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok Build 0.1 and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok Build 0.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper