Model comparison
Grok Build 0.1 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 35.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok Build 0.1 leads 31.3 to 25.4.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok Build 0.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 35.8 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2026-04-16 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 256K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok Build 0.1 leads
Grok Build 0.1: 42.5 (#90), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 38.9 (#154)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 50.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1346 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: 22.5 (#122), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | 2.4% | — |
Reasoning Grok Build 0.1 leads
Grok Build 0.1: 31.3 (#73), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 25.4 (#131)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 9.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1322 |
Math Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 33.6 (#169)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1305 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 35.4 (#175)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1307 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.8 (#185)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1304 |
| LMArena French | — | 1328 |
| LMArena German | — | 1283 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1268 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1337 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.8 (#182)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1298 |
Long Context Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#161)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1312 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.4 (#179)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1309 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok Build 0.1 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 35.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok Build 0.1 or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?
Grok Build 0.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.5 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok Build 0.1 and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok Build 0.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.