Model comparison
Grok Build 0.1 vs Llama 13b
Grok Build 0.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.8 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Grok Build 0.1 leads 42.5 to 20.9.
- Llama 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok Build 0.1 | Llama 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 35.8 | 23.9 |
| Released | 2026-04-16 | 2023-02-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 256K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok Build 0.1 leads
Grok Build 0.1: 42.5 (#90), Llama 13b: 20.9 (#332)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 50.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 683 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: 22.5 (#122), Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | 2.4% | — |
Reasoning Grok Build 0.1 leads
Grok Build 0.1: 31.3 (#73), Llama 13b: 13.4 (#327)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 9.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 728 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 37.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 100.09 |
| HellaSwag | — | 79.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 75.2% |
| PIQA | — | 80.1% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73% |
Math Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Llama 13b: 24.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 838 |
| GSM8K | — | 20.6% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 52.7% |
| BoolQ | — | 78.7% |
| MMLU | — | 47.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 56.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 77.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 43.3% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Llama 13b: 16.8 (#292)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 819 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Llama 13b: 36.9 (#300)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 781 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Llama 13b: 13.9 (#307)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 834 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 794 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 753 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok Build 0.1 better than Llama 13b?
Grok Build 0.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.8 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok Build 0.1 or Llama 13b better for coding?
Grok Build 0.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.5 versus 20.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok Build 0.1 and Llama 13b share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok Build 0.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.