Noometry

Model comparison

Grok 4 vs Trinity Large Thinking

Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4 xAI

47.8

Rank #49 Confirmed

Trinity Large Thinking Arcee AI

38.1

Rank #180 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4 scores higher in 8 categories and Trinity Large Thinking in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where Grok 4 leads 63.1 to 41.2.
  • Trinity Large Thinking has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4Trinity Large Thinking
ProviderxAIArcee AI
Noometry Index47.838.1
Released2025-07-092026-04-01
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—80K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.25
Output $ / M tokens—$0.80
Results tracked4824

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 49.9 (#44), Trinity Large Thinking: 33.8 (#238)

BenchmarkGrok 4Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Coding14081381
Aider Polyglot79.6%—
LMArena WebDev—1238
SciCode—36.1%
WeirdML45.7%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4: 32.1 (#62), Trinity Large Thinking: —

BenchmarkGrok 4Trinity Large Thinking
Terminal-Bench27.2%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard63%—
GDPval21.1%—
Cybench43%—
DeepResearch Bench47.3%—
BALROG43.6%—
LMArena Search1142—
METR Time Horizons66.6%—

Reasoning Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 36.9 (#59), Trinity Large Thinking: 16.3 (#298)

BenchmarkGrok 4Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Hard Prompts14091350
ARC-AGI-216%—
SimpleBench60.5%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark73.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)—16.5%
ARC-AGI-166.7%—
CritPt—0.9%
Chess Puzzles28%—
Thematic Generalization—41.6%
Surface Evolver Bench—15.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index146.46—
ForecastBench60.9—

Math Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 46.5 (#58), Trinity Large Thinking: 34.9 (#149)

BenchmarkGrok 4Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Math14221366
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202584%—
Omni-MATH60.3%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)19.7%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—

Knowledge Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 53.7 (#50), Trinity Large Thinking: 40.3 (#107)

BenchmarkGrok 4Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Expert14171359
GPQA Diamond87%—
MMLU-Pro85.1%—
Confabulations12.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—6.9%
GPQA (HELM)72.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4: 33.1 (#89), Trinity Large Thinking: —

BenchmarkGrok 4Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Vision1211—
GeoBench45%—

Multilingual Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 52.0 (#98), Trinity Large Thinking: 46.4 (#155)

BenchmarkGrok 4Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Non-English14031325
LMArena Chinese14281372
LMArena French14181374
LMArena German14291356
LMArena Japanese13961312
LMArena Korean13761304
LMArena Russian14091338
LMArena Spanish14191356

Instruction Following Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 79.4 (#4), Trinity Large Thinking: 70.7 (#157)

BenchmarkGrok 4Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Instruction Following13871334
IFEval94.9%—

Long Context Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 63.1 (#4), Trinity Large Thinking: 41.2 (#139)

BenchmarkGrok 4Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Longer Query14091355
Fiction.LiveBench94.4%—

Writing & Preference Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 58.7 (#111), Trinity Large Thinking: 54.0 (#152)

BenchmarkGrok 4Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Text14121340
LMArena Creative Writing13971321
LMArena Multi-Turn14161342
Short-Story Creative Writing76.9%—
WildBench79.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4 better than Trinity Large Thinking?

Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4 or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?

Grok 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.9 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4 and Trinity Large Thinking share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4 has 48 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.

Related comparisons

Go deeper