Noometry

Model comparison

Grok 4 vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 22 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4 xAI

48.1

Rank #56 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

45.3

Rank #72 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4 scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 6 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where Grok 4 leads 63.1 to 44.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 84% for Grok 4 and 93.3% for Qwen3.7 Plus.

Side by side

Grok 4Qwen3.7 Plus
ProviderxAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index48.145.3
Released2025-07-092026-06-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$1.60
Results tracked4832

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 50.3 (#46), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Coding14081473
FrontierCode—10.2%
Aider Polyglot79.6%—
SciCode—45.5%
WeirdML45.7%—

Agentic & Tool Use Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 32.3 (#68), Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3.7 Plus
Terminal-Bench27.2%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard63%—
OSWorld 2.0—2.8%
GDPval21.1%—
Cybench43%—
DeepResearch Bench47.3%—
BALROG43.6%—
LMArena Search1142—
METR Time Horizons66.6%—

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Grok 4: 36.7 (#65), Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3.7 Plus
Chess Puzzles28%24%
LMArena Hard Prompts14091460
Epoch Capabilities Index146.44147.37
ARC-AGI-216%—
SimpleBench60.5%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark73.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)—74.8%
ARC-AGI-166.7%—
CritPt—9.1%
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
DTBench—84%
LMCA—37.6%
ForecastBench60.9—

Math Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Grok 4: 48.4 (#64), Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3.7 Plus
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202584%93.3%
LMArena Math14221466
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—34.4%
Omni-MATH60.3%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)19.7%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Grok 4: 53.8 (#55), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3.7 Plus
GPQA Diamond87%87.9%
LMArena Expert14151467
MMLU-Pro85.1%—
Confabulations12.4%—
GPQA (HELM)72.7%—

Multimodal Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Grok 4: 33.7 (#94), Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision12101279
GeoBench45%—
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Grok 4: 51.8 (#103), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Non-English14031445
LMArena Chinese14271510
LMArena French14181473
LMArena German14291471
LMArena Japanese13941413
LMArena Korean13771415
LMArena Russian14101457
LMArena Spanish14201457

Instruction Following Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 79.2 (#5), Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following13871440
IFEval94.9%—

Long Context Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 63.1 (#4), Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Longer Query14091455
Fiction.LiveBench94.4%—

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Grok 4: 58.5 (#116), Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text14111455
LMArena Creative Writing13971439
LMArena Multi-Turn14161460
Short-Story Creative Writing76.9%—
WildBench79.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4 better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4 or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Grok 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.3 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4 and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

22 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4 has 48 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper