Noometry

Model comparison

Grok 4 vs Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 48.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4 xAI

48.1

Rank #56 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

51.5

Rank #42 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4 scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3.7 Max in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where Grok 4 leads 63.1 to 45.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 84% for Grok 4 and 95.6% for Qwen3.7 Max.

Side by side

Grok 4Qwen3.7 Max
ProviderxAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index48.151.5
Released2025-07-092026-05-19
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$2.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked4833

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Grok 4: 50.3 (#46), Qwen3.7 Max: 50.4 (#45)

BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Coding14081498
SWE-bench Verified—77.3%
Aider Polyglot79.6%—
LMArena WebDev—1515
SciCode—48.8%
WeirdML45.7%—
ALE-Bench—1,189

Agentic & Tool Use Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 32.3 (#68), Qwen3.7 Max: 22.1 (#135)

BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3.7 Max
Terminal-Bench27.2%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard63%—
GDPval21.1%—
Cybench43%—
DeepResearch Bench47.3%—
BALROG43.6%—
GBAEval—0.4%
LMArena Search1142—
METR Time Horizons66.6%—

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Max leads

Grok 4: 36.7 (#65), Qwen3.7 Max: 49.2 (#38)

BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3.7 Max
SimpleBench60.5%70.4%
Chess Puzzles28%19%
LMArena Hard Prompts14091483
Epoch Capabilities Index146.44153.68
ARC-AGI-216%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark73.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)—85.1%
ARC-AGI-166.7%—
CritPt—13.4%
EBR-Bench—9.5%
Mystery Game Puzzles—32%
DTBench—92.3%
LMCA—44%
ForecastBench60.9—

Math Qwen3.7 Max leads

Grok 4: 48.4 (#64), Qwen3.7 Max: 62.4 (#32)

BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3.7 Max
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202584%95.6%
LMArena Math14221490
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—64.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4—34.1%
ProofBench—26%
Omni-MATH60.3%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)19.7%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Max leads

Grok 4: 53.8 (#55), Qwen3.7 Max: 61.6 (#28)

BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3.7 Max
GPQA Diamond87%90.9%
LMArena Expert14151488
SimpleQA Verified—55.8%
MMLU-Pro85.1%—
Confabulations12.4%—
GPQA (HELM)72.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4: 33.7 (#94), Qwen3.7 Max: —

BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Vision1210—
GeoBench45%—

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Max leads

Grok 4: 51.8 (#103), Qwen3.7 Max: 56.9 (#15)

BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Non-English14031474
LMArena Chinese14271530
LMArena Russian14101484
LMArena French1418—
LMArena German1429—
LMArena Japanese1394—
LMArena Korean1377—
LMArena Spanish1420—

Instruction Following Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 79.2 (#5), Qwen3.7 Max: 76.7 (#38)

BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Instruction Following13871460
IFEval94.9%—

Long Context Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 63.1 (#4), Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#40)

BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Longer Query14091482
Fiction.LiveBench94.4%—

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Max leads

Grok 4: 58.5 (#116), Qwen3.7 Max: 65.0 (#54)

BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Text14111476
LMArena Creative Writing13971449
LMArena Multi-Turn14161481
Short-Story Creative Writing76.9%—
WildBench79.7%—
EQ-Bench 4—1110

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4 better than Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 48.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4 or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (50.3 vs 50.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4 and Qwen3.7 Max share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4 has 48 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper