Noometry

Model comparison

Grok 4 vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4 xAI

48.1

Rank #56 Confirmed

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)

32.7

Rank #254 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 4 leads 53.8 to 19.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Omni-MATH: 60.3% for Grok 4 and 16.1% for Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct.
  • Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
ProviderxAIAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index48.132.7
Released2025-07-09—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4816

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 50.3 (#46), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)

BenchmarkGrok 4Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding14081210
Aider Polyglot79.6%—
WeirdML45.7%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4: 32.3 (#68), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —

BenchmarkGrok 4Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
Terminal-Bench27.2%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard63%—
GDPval21.1%—
Cybench43%—
DeepResearch Bench47.3%—
BALROG43.6%—
LMArena Search1142—
METR Time Horizons66.6%—

Reasoning Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 36.7 (#65), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)

BenchmarkGrok 4Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14091208
ARC-AGI-216%—
SimpleBench60.5%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark73.6%—
ARC-AGI-166.7%—
Chess Puzzles28%—
Epoch Capabilities Index146.44—
ForecastBench60.9—

Math Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 48.4 (#64), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)

BenchmarkGrok 4Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
Omni-MATH60.3%16.1%
LMArena Math14221208
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202584%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)19.7%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—

Knowledge Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 53.8 (#55), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)

BenchmarkGrok 4Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
MMLU-Pro85.1%41.4%
GPQA (HELM)72.7%28.7%
GPQA Diamond87%—
Confabulations12.4%—
LMArena Expert1415—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4: 33.7 (#94), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —

BenchmarkGrok 4Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Vision1210—
GeoBench45%—

Multilingual Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 51.8 (#103), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)

BenchmarkGrok 4Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English14031160
LMArena Chinese14271192
LMArena Russian14101187
LMArena French1418—
LMArena German1429—
LMArena Japanese1394—
LMArena Korean1377—
LMArena Spanish1420—

Instruction Following Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 79.2 (#5), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)

BenchmarkGrok 4Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
IFEval94.9%78%
LMArena Instruction Following13871186

Long Context Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 63.1 (#4), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)

BenchmarkGrok 4Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14091194
Fiction.LiveBench94.4%—

Writing & Preference Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 58.5 (#116), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)

BenchmarkGrok 4Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Text14111218
LMArena Creative Writing13971199
WildBench79.7%73.4%
LMArena Multi-Turn14161221
Short-Story Creative Writing76.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4 better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4 or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

Grok 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.3 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4 and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4 has 48 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper