Noometry

Model comparison

Grok 4 vs Mistral Nemo

Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4 xAI

48.1

Rank #56 Confirmed

Mistral Nemo Mistral AI

26.4

Rank #337 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4 scores higher in 5 categories and Mistral Nemo in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 4 leads 53.8 to 12.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 87% for Grok 4 and 29.9% for Mistral Nemo.
  • Mistral Nemo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4Mistral Nemo
ProviderxAIMistral AI
Noometry Index48.126.4
Released2025-07-092024-07-01
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.15
Output $ / M tokens—$0.15
Results tracked4810

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Grok 4: 50.3 (#46), Mistral Nemo: —

BenchmarkGrok 4Mistral Nemo
Aider Polyglot79.6%—
WeirdML45.7%—
LMArena Coding1408—

Agentic & Tool Use Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 32.3 (#68), Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125)

BenchmarkGrok 4Mistral Nemo
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard63%27.6%
BALROG43.6%17.6%
Terminal-Bench27.2%—
GDPval21.1%—
Cybench43%—
DeepResearch Bench47.3%—
LMArena Search1142—
METR Time Horizons66.6%—

Reasoning Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 36.7 (#65), Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232)

BenchmarkGrok 4Mistral Nemo
Epoch Capabilities Index146.44118.68
ARC-AGI-216%—
SimpleBench60.5%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark73.6%—
ARC-AGI-166.7%—
Chess Puzzles28%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1409—
DTBench—48.6%
ForecastBench60.9—
PIQA—83.5%

Math Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 48.4 (#64), Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268)

BenchmarkGrok 4Mistral Nemo
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202584%—
Omni-MATH60.3%—
LMArena Math1422—
MATH Level 5—10.8%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)19.7%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—
GSM8K—84.2%

Knowledge Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 53.8 (#55), Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298)

BenchmarkGrok 4Mistral Nemo
GPQA Diamond87%29.9%
MMLU-Pro85.1%—
Confabulations12.4%—
GPQA (HELM)72.7%—
LMArena Expert1415—
BoolQ—82.5%

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4: 33.7 (#94), Mistral Nemo: —

BenchmarkGrok 4Mistral Nemo
LMArena Vision1210—
GeoBench45%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Grok 4: 51.8 (#103), Mistral Nemo: —

BenchmarkGrok 4Mistral Nemo
LMArena Non-English1403—
LMArena Chinese1427—
LMArena French1418—
LMArena German1429—
LMArena Japanese1394—
LMArena Korean1377—
LMArena Russian1410—
LMArena Spanish1420—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Grok 4: 79.2 (#5), Mistral Nemo: —

BenchmarkGrok 4Mistral Nemo
IFEval94.9%—
LMArena Instruction Following1387—

Long Context Not comparable

Grok 4: 63.1 (#4), Mistral Nemo: —

BenchmarkGrok 4Mistral Nemo
Fiction.LiveBench94.4%—
LMArena Longer Query1409—

Writing & Preference Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 58.5 (#116), Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296)

BenchmarkGrok 4Mistral Nemo
LMArena Text1411—
LMArena Creative Writing1397—
Short-Story Creative Writing76.9%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—881
WildBench79.7%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1416—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4 better than Mistral Nemo?

Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4 and Mistral Nemo share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4 has 48 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Nemo has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper