Noometry

Model comparison

Grok 4 vs Hunyuan Turbo 0110

Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 39.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4 xAI

47.8

Rank #49 Confirmed

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 Tencent

39.0

Rank #165 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4 scores higher in 7 categories and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where Grok 4 leads 63.1 to 39.8.

Side by side

Grok 4Hunyuan Turbo 0110
ProviderxAITencent
Noometry Index47.839.0
Released2025-07-09—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4811

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 49.9 (#44), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.0 (#168)

BenchmarkGrok 4Hunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Coding14081320
Aider Polyglot79.6%—
WeirdML45.7%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4: 32.1 (#62), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —

BenchmarkGrok 4Hunyuan Turbo 0110
Terminal-Bench27.2%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard63%—
GDPval21.1%—
Cybench43%—
DeepResearch Bench47.3%—
BALROG43.6%—
LMArena Search1142—
METR Time Horizons66.6%—

Reasoning Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 36.9 (#59), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 25.0 (#135)

BenchmarkGrok 4Hunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Hard Prompts14091308
ARC-AGI-216%—
SimpleBench60.5%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark73.6%—
ARC-AGI-166.7%—
Chess Puzzles28%—
Epoch Capabilities Index146.46—
ForecastBench60.9—

Math Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 46.5 (#58), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 32.9 (#180)

BenchmarkGrok 4Hunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Math14221273
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202584%—
Omni-MATH60.3%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)19.7%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok 4: 53.7 (#50), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —

BenchmarkGrok 4Hunyuan Turbo 0110
GPQA Diamond87%—
MMLU-Pro85.1%—
Confabulations12.4%—
GPQA (HELM)72.7%—
LMArena Expert1417—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4: 33.1 (#89), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —

BenchmarkGrok 4Hunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Vision1211—
GeoBench45%—

Multilingual Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 52.0 (#98), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.5 (#178)

BenchmarkGrok 4Hunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Non-English14031285
LMArena Chinese14281358
LMArena Russian14091305
LMArena French1418—
LMArena German1429—
LMArena Japanese1396—
LMArena Korean1376—
LMArena Spanish1419—

Instruction Following Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 79.4 (#4), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.7 (#190)

BenchmarkGrok 4Hunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Instruction Following13871279
IFEval94.9%—

Long Context Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 63.1 (#4), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#163)

BenchmarkGrok 4Hunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Longer Query14091309
Fiction.LiveBench94.4%—

Writing & Preference Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 58.7 (#111), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.4 (#176)

BenchmarkGrok 4Hunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Text14121311
LMArena Creative Writing13971269
LMArena Multi-Turn14161303
Short-Story Creative Writing76.9%—
WildBench79.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4 better than Hunyuan Turbo 0110?

Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 39.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4 or Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better for coding?

Grok 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.9 versus 38.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4 and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4 has 48 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper