Model comparison

Grok 4 Fast vs Step 3

Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4 Fast xAI

39.4

Rank #167 Confirmed

Step 3 StepFun

40.5

Rank #149 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4 Fast scores higher in 5 categories and Step 3 in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where Grok 4 Fast leads 63.2 to 40.3.
  • Step 3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4 Fast and Step 3 specifications
Grok 4 FastStep 3
ProviderxAIStepFun
Noometry Index39.440.5
Released2025-09-19—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3017

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 3 leads

Grok 4 Fast: 32.5 (#271), Step 3: 40.1 (#147)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastStep 3
LMArena Coding14291367
LMArena WebDev1159—
WeirdML42.9%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4 Fast: 29.5 (#86), Step 3: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastStep 3
τ²-bench Banking15.7%—
Cybench30%—
LMArena Search1171—

Reasoning Step 3 leads

Grok 4 Fast: 22.2 (#201), Step 3: 28.4 (#105)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastStep 3
Kagi LLM Benchmark66.1%62.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts14121355
ARC-AGI-25.3%—
ARC-AGI-148.5%—
DTBench82.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index144.2—
ForecastBench60.5—

Math Grok 4 Fast leads

Grok 4 Fast: 38.9 (#123), Step 3: 37.6 (#148)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastStep 3
LMArena Math14191366

Knowledge Step 3 leads

Grok 4 Fast: 32.0 (#214), Step 3: 36.8 (#164)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastStep 3
LMArena Expert14111333
Vectara Hallucination Rate19.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4 Fast: —, Step 3: 35.5 (#86)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastStep 3
LMArena Vision—1177

Multilingual Grok 4 Fast leads

Grok 4 Fast: 51.3 (#111), Step 3: 46.3 (#159)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastStep 3
LMArena Non-English13961327
LMArena Chinese14571397
LMArena German13831371
LMArena Korean13571269
LMArena Russian13891331
LMArena Spanish14151371
LMArena French1431—
LMArena Japanese1352—

Instruction Following Grok 4 Fast leads

Grok 4 Fast: 73.2 (#121), Step 3: 70.4 (#164)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastStep 3
LMArena Instruction Following13871332

Long Context Grok 4 Fast leads

Grok 4 Fast: 63.2 (#3), Step 3: 40.3 (#157)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastStep 3
LMArena Longer Query14151326
Fiction.LiveBench94.4%—

Writing & Preference Grok 4 Fast leads

Grok 4 Fast: 60.0 (#102), Step 3: 54.3 (#151)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastStep 3
LMArena Text14071350
LMArena Creative Writing13871321
LMArena Multi-Turn14141341

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4 Fast better than Step 3?

Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4 Fast or Step 3 better for coding?

Step 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 32.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4 Fast and Step 3 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4 Fast has 30 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper