Model comparison
Grok 4 Fast vs Palm 2
Grok 4 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4 Fast scores higher in 7 categories and Palm 2 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4 Fast leads 60.0 to 25.6.
Side by side
| Grok 4 Fast | Palm 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 39.4 | 30.0 |
| Released | 2025-09-19 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 30 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4 Fast leads
Grok 4 Fast: 32.5 (#271), Palm 2: 29.0 (#311)
| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1429 | 994 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1159 | — |
| WeirdML | 42.9% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok 4 Fast: 29.5 (#86), Palm 2: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench Banking | 15.7% | — |
| Cybench | 30% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1171 | — |
Reasoning Grok 4 Fast leads
Grok 4 Fast: 22.2 (#201), Palm 2: 19.1 (#271)
| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1412 | 1005 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 5.3% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 66.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 48.5% | — |
| DTBench | 82.7% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.2 | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.5 | — |
Math Grok 4 Fast leads
Grok 4 Fast: 38.9 (#123), Palm 2: 30.8 (#231)
| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1419 | 1049 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Grok 4 Fast: 32.0 (#214), Palm 2: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 19.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1411 | — |
Multilingual Grok 4 Fast leads
Grok 4 Fast: 51.3 (#111), Palm 2: 20.9 (#295)
| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1396 | 916 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1457 | 887 |
| LMArena French | 1431 | — |
| LMArena German | 1383 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1352 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1357 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1389 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1415 | — |
Instruction Following Grok 4 Fast leads
Grok 4 Fast: 73.2 (#121), Palm 2: 51.0 (#296)
| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1387 | 1010 |
Long Context Grok 4 Fast leads
Grok 4 Fast: 63.2 (#3), Palm 2: 30.8 (#285)
| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | 1010 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 94.4% | — |
Writing & Preference Grok 4 Fast leads
Grok 4 Fast: 60.0 (#102), Palm 2: 25.6 (#304)
| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1407 | 1027 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1387 | 991 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1414 | 994 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4 Fast better than Palm 2?
Grok 4 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 4 Fast or Palm 2 better for coding?
Grok 4 Fast scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.5 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4 Fast and Palm 2 share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4 Fast has 30 scored results on Noometry and Palm 2 has 10.