Model comparison

Grok 4 Fast vs Mercury 2

Grok 4 Fast and Mercury 2 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.4 vs 39.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4 Fast xAI

39.4

Rank #167 Confirmed

Mercury 2 Inception

39.1

Rank #175 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4 Fast scores higher in 4 categories and Mercury 2 in 3 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where Grok 4 Fast leads 63.2 to 40.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Vectara Hallucination Rate: 19.7% for Grok 4 Fast and 12.3% for Mercury 2.

Side by side

Grok 4 Fast and Mercury 2 specifications
Grok 4 FastMercury 2
ProviderxAIInception
Noometry Index39.439.1
Released2025-09-192026-02-20
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—128K
Max output—50K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.25
Output $ / M tokens—$0.75
Results tracked3017

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mercury 2 leads

Grok 4 Fast: 32.5 (#271), Mercury 2: 33.5 (#255)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastMercury 2
LMArena WebDev11591171
WeirdML42.9%43.2%
LMArena Coding14291391
SciCode—38.7%
ALE-Bench—785.58

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4 Fast: 29.5 (#86), Mercury 2: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastMercury 2
τ²-bench Banking15.7%—
Cybench30%—
LMArena Search1171—

Reasoning Mercury 2 leads

Grok 4 Fast: 22.2 (#201), Mercury 2: 23.8 (#170)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastMercury 2
LMArena Hard Prompts14121362
ARC-AGI-25.3%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark66.1%—
ARC-AGI-148.5%—
CritPt—0.8%
DTBench82.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index144.2—
ForecastBench60.5—

Math Not comparable

Grok 4 Fast: 38.9 (#123), Mercury 2: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastMercury 2
LMArena Math1419—

Knowledge Mercury 2 leads

Grok 4 Fast: 32.0 (#214), Mercury 2: 36.2 (#172)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastMercury 2
Vectara Hallucination Rate19.7%12.3%
LMArena Expert14111358

Multilingual Grok 4 Fast leads

Grok 4 Fast: 51.3 (#111), Mercury 2: 46.6 (#157)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastMercury 2
LMArena Non-English13961331
LMArena Chinese14571417
LMArena Russian13891304
LMArena French1431—
LMArena German1383—
LMArena Japanese1352—
LMArena Korean1357—
LMArena Spanish1415—

Instruction Following Grok 4 Fast leads

Grok 4 Fast: 73.2 (#121), Mercury 2: 70.2 (#165)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastMercury 2
LMArena Instruction Following13871329

Long Context Grok 4 Fast leads

Grok 4 Fast: 63.2 (#3), Mercury 2: 40.5 (#154)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastMercury 2
LMArena Longer Query14151330
Fiction.LiveBench94.4%—

Writing & Preference Grok 4 Fast leads

Grok 4 Fast: 60.0 (#102), Mercury 2: 53.8 (#155)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastMercury 2
LMArena Text14071355
LMArena Creative Writing13871289
LMArena Multi-Turn14141358

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4 Fast better than Mercury 2?

Grok 4 Fast and Mercury 2 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.4 vs 39.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Grok 4 Fast or Mercury 2 better for coding?

Mercury 2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.5 versus 32.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4 Fast and Mercury 2 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4 Fast has 30 scored results on Noometry and Mercury 2 has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper