Noometry

Model comparison

Grok 4.7 vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.7 xAI

53.1

Rank #37 Confirmed

Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)

33.0

Rank #251 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 8 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Grok 4.7 leads 57.8 to 14.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 98.1% for Grok 4.7 and 4.4% for Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B.
  • Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4.7Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
ProviderxAIAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index53.133.0
Released2026-09-212024-11-21
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window500K—
Max output500K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$6—
Results tracked3914

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 58.0 (#18), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 36.0 (#214)

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Coding14271235
FrontierCode47.6%—
CursorBench46.3%—
LMArena WebDev1639—
FrontierSWE29.5%—
SciCode57.8%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 36.7 (#37), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
APEX-Agents54.6%—
GDP.pdf22.8%—
Vending-Bench 210,537—

Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 49.1 (#40), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 23.9 (#169)

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Hard Prompts14131220
NYT Connections (extended)76.8%—
CritPt18%—
Chess Puzzles38%—
Mystery Game Puzzles29%—
DTBench96%—
LMCA49.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index153.53—

Math Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 57.8 (#39), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 14.2 (#303)

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.1%4.4%
LMArena Math14071242
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)53%—
FrontierMath Tier 417.1%—
ProofBench34%—
MATH Level 5—42.7%

Knowledge Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 62.8 (#22), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.0 (#264)

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
GPQA Diamond92.7%46.3%
SimpleQA Verified56%—
LMArena Expert1422—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 35.5 (#87), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Vision1228—
Blueprint-Bench 232.5%—
Furniture Assembly20.8%—

Multilingual Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 50.8 (#116), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 39.9 (#222)

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Non-English13891236
LMArena Chinese14551249
LMArena Russian13971246
LMArena French1455—
LMArena Spanish1400—

Instruction Following Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 74.1 (#105), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 64.8 (#227)

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Instruction Following14041233

Long Context Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 43.1 (#104), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#222)

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Longer Query14131224

Writing & Preference Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 70.0 (#24), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.6 (#223)

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Text13991256
LMArena Creative Writing13911231
LMArena Multi-Turn13931252
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2007—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.7 better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4.7 or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.0 versus 36.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 39 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper