Model comparison

Grok 4.7 vs StarCoder 2 15B

Grok 4.7 has enough public results to be ranked (#37); StarCoder 2 15B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.7 xAI

53.1

Rank #37 Confirmed

StarCoder 2 15B NVIDIA

38.1

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 1 category and StarCoder 2 15B in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Grok 4.7 leads 58.0 to 36.6.
  • StarCoder 2 15B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4.7 and StarCoder 2 15B specifications
Grok 4.7StarCoder 2 15B
ProviderxAINVIDIA
Noometry Index53.138.1
Released2026-09-212024-02-20
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window500K—
Max output500K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$6—
Results tracked397

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 58.0 (#18), StarCoder 2 15B: 36.6

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7StarCoder 2 15B
FrontierCode47.6%—
CursorBench46.3%—
LMArena WebDev1639—
FrontierSWE29.5%—
SciCode57.8%—
LMArena Coding1427—
BigCodeBench Complete—38.4%
HumanEval+—37.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 36.7 (#37), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7StarCoder 2 15B
APEX-Agents54.6%—
GDP.pdf22.8%—
Vending-Bench 210,537—

Reasoning Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 49.1 (#40), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7StarCoder 2 15B
Epoch Capabilities Index153.53105
NYT Connections (extended)76.8%—
CritPt18%—
Chess Puzzles38%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1413—
Mystery Game Puzzles29%—
DTBench96%—
LMCA49.4%—
WinoGrande—64.3%

Math Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 57.8 (#39), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7StarCoder 2 15B
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)53%—
FrontierMath Tier 417.1%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.1%—
ProofBench34%—
LMArena Math1407—
GSM8K—57.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 62.8 (#22), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7StarCoder 2 15B
GPQA Diamond92.7%—
SimpleQA Verified56%—
LMArena Expert1422—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—47.2%
MMLU—64.1%

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 35.5 (#87), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7StarCoder 2 15B
LMArena Vision1228—
Blueprint-Bench 232.5%—
Furniture Assembly20.8%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 50.8 (#116), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7StarCoder 2 15B
LMArena Non-English1389—
LMArena Chinese1455—
LMArena French1455—
LMArena Russian1397—
LMArena Spanish1400—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 74.1 (#105), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7StarCoder 2 15B
LMArena Instruction Following1404—

Long Context Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 43.1 (#104), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7StarCoder 2 15B
LMArena Longer Query1413—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 70.0 (#24), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7StarCoder 2 15B
LMArena Text1399—
LMArena Creative Writing1391—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2007—
LMArena Multi-Turn1393—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.7 better than StarCoder 2 15B?

Grok 4.7 has enough public results to be ranked (#37); StarCoder 2 15B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is Grok 4.7 or StarCoder 2 15B better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.0 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and StarCoder 2 15B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 39 scored results on Noometry and StarCoder 2 15B has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper