Model comparison
Grok 4.7 vs Qwen3.5-2B
Grok 4.7 has enough public results to be ranked (#56); Qwen3.5-2B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.7 leads 40.1 to 18.5.
- Qwen3.5-2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.5-2B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 46.6 | 28.7 |
| Released | 2026-09-21 | 2026-02-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 500K | — |
| Max output | 500K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $6 | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 1 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23), Qwen3.5-2B: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.5-2B |
|---|---|---|
| CursorBench | 46.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1636 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 29.5% | — |
| SciCode | 57.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1423 | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49), Qwen3.5-2B: 18.5
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.5-2B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 76.8% | — |
| CritPt | 17.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1409 | — |
Math Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73), Qwen3.5-2B: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.5-2B |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 34% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1393 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130), Qwen3.5-2B: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.5-2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1413 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107), Qwen3.5-2B: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.5-2B |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 20.8% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108), Qwen3.5-2B: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.5-2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1476 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1396 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98), Qwen3.5-2B: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.5-2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1406 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97), Qwen3.5-2B: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.5-2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23), Qwen3.5-2B: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.5-2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1397 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2007 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1389 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.7 better than Qwen3.5-2B?
Grok 4.7 has enough public results to be ranked (#56); Qwen3.5-2B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and Qwen3.5-2B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-2B has 1.