Model comparison

Grok 4.7 vs Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.7 xAI

46.6

Rank #56 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct Microsoft

27.4

Rank #324 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.7 leads 70.1 to 27.7.
  • Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4.7 and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct specifications
Grok 4.7Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
ProviderxAIMicrosoft
Noometry Index46.627.4
Released2026-09-212024-04-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window500K—
Max output500K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$6—
Results tracked2135

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.1 (#319)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Coding14231093
CursorBench46.3%—
LMArena WebDev1636—
FrontierSWE29.5%—
SciCode57.4%—
LiveBench Coding—15.5%
HumanEval+—59.1%
MBPP+—54.2%

Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 13.6 (#326)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14091072
NYT Connections (extended)76.8%—
CritPt17.7%—
Chess Puzzles—0%
LiveBench Reasoning—26.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis—34.7%
Adversarial NLI—52.8%
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%
HellaSwag—76.7%
LiveBench—22.4%
WinoGrande—70.8%

Math Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 24.5 (#258)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Math13931111
ProofBench34%—
LiveBench Math—15.7%

Knowledge Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.9 (#241)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Expert14131045
ARC (AI2) Challenge—84.9%
MMLU—68.8%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—64%

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
Furniture Assembly20.8%—

Multilingual Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.5 (#275)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Non-English13921021
LMArena Chinese14761021
LMArena Russian13961022
LMArena French—1075
LMArena German—1044
LMArena Japanese—935
LMArena Korean—905
LMArena Spanish—1084

Instruction Following Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 48.0 (#298)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14061053
LiveBench Instruction Following—39.1%

Long Context Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 31.7 (#271)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14161044

Writing & Preference Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.7 (#295)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Text13971073
LMArena Creative Writing13911037
LMArena Multi-Turn13891018
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2007—
LiveBench Language—9.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.7 better than Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4.7 or Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 26.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper