Model comparison
Grok 4.7 vs o1-pro
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.7 leads 40.1 to 20.2.
- Grok 4.7 is cheaper at $2 / $6 per million input/output tokens, against $150 / $600 for o1-pro.
- Grok 4.7 accepts more context: 500K tokens versus 200K.
Side by side
| Grok 4.7 | o1-pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 46.6 | 31.2 |
| Released | 2026-09-21 | 2025-03-19 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 500K | 200K |
| Max output | 500K | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | $150 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $6 | $600 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| CursorBench | 46.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1636 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 29.5% | — |
| SciCode | 57.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1423 | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49), o1-pro: 20.2 (#223)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 76.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 23.3% |
| CritPt | 17.7% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 6.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1409 | — |
Math Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 34% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1393 | — |
Knowledge Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130), o1-pro: 29.3 (#227)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1413 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 20.8% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1476 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1396 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1406 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1397 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2007 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1389 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.7 better than o1-pro?
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7 or o1-pro?
Grok 4.7 is cheaper. It lists at $2 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens; o1-pro lists at $150 and $600.
Which has the bigger context window?
Grok 4.7 does, with 500K tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and o1-pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 21 scored results on Noometry and o1-pro has 3.