Model comparison

Grok 4.7 vs Nova 2.0 Pro Preview

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.7 xAI

53.1

Rank #37 Confirmed

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview Amazon

33.4

Rank #244 Reported

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 3 categories and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.7 leads 49.1 to 22.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GDP.pdf: 22.8% for Grok 4.7 and 2% for Nova 2.0 Pro Preview.

Side by side

Grok 4.7 and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview specifications
Grok 4.7Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
ProviderxAIAmazon
Noometry Index53.133.4
Released2026-09-212025-12-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window500K—
Max output500K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$6—
Results tracked393

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 58.0 (#18), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.8 (#133)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
SciCode57.8%42.7%
FrontierCode47.6%—
CursorBench46.3%—
LMArena WebDev1639—
FrontierSWE29.5%—
LMArena Coding1427—

Agentic & Tool Use Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 36.7 (#37), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#136)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
GDP.pdf22.8%2%
APEX-Agents54.6%—
Vending-Bench 210,537—

Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 49.1 (#40), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 22.4 (#194)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
CritPt18%0%
NYT Connections (extended)76.8%—
Chess Puzzles38%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1413—
Mystery Game Puzzles29%—
DTBench96%—
LMCA49.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index153.53—

Math Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 57.8 (#39), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)53%—
FrontierMath Tier 417.1%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.1%—
ProofBench34%—
LMArena Math1407—

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 62.8 (#22), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
GPQA Diamond92.7%—
SimpleQA Verified56%—
LMArena Expert1422—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 35.5 (#87), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Vision1228—
Blueprint-Bench 232.5%—
Furniture Assembly20.8%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 50.8 (#116), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Non-English1389—
LMArena Chinese1455—
LMArena French1455—
LMArena Russian1397—
LMArena Spanish1400—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 74.1 (#105), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Instruction Following1404—

Long Context Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 43.1 (#104), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Longer Query1413—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 70.0 (#24), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Text1399—
LMArena Creative Writing1391—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2007—
LMArena Multi-Turn1393—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.7 better than Nova 2.0 Pro Preview?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4.7 or Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.0 versus 40.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 39 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper