Noometry

Model comparison

Grok 4.7 vs Ministral 3B

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 3B costs 30× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.7 xAI

53.1

Rank #37 Confirmed

Ministral 3B Mistral AI

26.2

Rank #338 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 3 categories and Ministral 3B in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 4.7 leads 62.8 to 10.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 92.7% for Grok 4.7 and 25.3% for Ministral 3B.
  • Ministral 3B is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.10 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Grok 4.7.
  • Grok 4.7 accepts more context: 500K tokens versus 131K.
  • Ministral 3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4.7Ministral 3B
ProviderxAIMistral AI
Noometry Index53.126.2
Released2026-09-212024-10-01
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window500K131K
Max output500K262K
Input $ / M tokens$2$0.10
Output $ / M tokens$6$0.10
Results tracked396

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 58.0 (#18), Ministral 3B: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Ministral 3B
FrontierCode47.6%—
CursorBench46.3%—
LMArena WebDev1639—
FrontierSWE29.5%—
SciCode57.8%—
LMArena Coding1427—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 36.7 (#37), Ministral 3B: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Ministral 3B
APEX-Agents54.6%—
GDP.pdf22.8%—
Vending-Bench 210,537—

Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 49.1 (#40), Ministral 3B: 18.4 (#282)

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Ministral 3B
DTBench96%51.7%
LMCA49.4%5.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index153.53118.1
NYT Connections (extended)76.8%—
CritPt18%—
Chess Puzzles38%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1413—
Mystery Game Puzzles29%—

Math Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 57.8 (#39), Ministral 3B: 26.6 (#258)

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Ministral 3B
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)53%—
FrontierMath Tier 417.1%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.1%—
ProofBench34%—
LMArena Math1407—
MATH Level 5—14.4%

Knowledge Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 62.8 (#22), Ministral 3B: 10.4 (#302)

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Ministral 3B
GPQA Diamond92.7%25.3%
SimpleQA Verified56%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—7.3%
LMArena Expert1422—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 35.5 (#87), Ministral 3B: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Ministral 3B
LMArena Vision1228—
Blueprint-Bench 232.5%—
Furniture Assembly20.8%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 50.8 (#116), Ministral 3B: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Ministral 3B
LMArena Non-English1389—
LMArena Chinese1455—
LMArena French1455—
LMArena Russian1397—
LMArena Spanish1400—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 74.1 (#105), Ministral 3B: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Ministral 3B
LMArena Instruction Following1404—

Long Context Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 43.1 (#104), Ministral 3B: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Ministral 3B
LMArena Longer Query1413—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 70.0 (#24), Ministral 3B: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Ministral 3B
LMArena Text1399—
LMArena Creative Writing1391—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2007—
LMArena Multi-Turn1393—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.7 better than Ministral 3B?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 3B costs 30× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7 or Ministral 3B?

Ministral 3B is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.10 per million output tokens; Grok 4.7 lists at $2 and $6.

Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4.7 does, with 500K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and Ministral 3B share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 39 scored results on Noometry and Ministral 3B has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper