Model comparison
Grok 4.7 vs Hunyuan Vision 1.5
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 6 categories and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.7 leads 49.1 to 28.9.
Side by side
| Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 53.1 | 43.1 |
| Released | 2026-09-21 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 500K | — |
| Max output | 500K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $6 | — |
| Results tracked | 39 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 58.0 (#18), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1427 | 1418 |
| FrontierCode | 47.6% | — |
| CursorBench | 46.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1639 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 29.5% | — |
| SciCode | 57.8% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 36.7 (#37), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 54.6% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 22.8% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 10,537 | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 49.1 (#40), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1413 | 1416 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 76.8% | — |
| CritPt | 18% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 38% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 29% | — |
| DTBench | 96% | — |
| LMCA | 49.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 153.53 | — |
Math Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 57.8 (#39), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 53% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 17.1% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.1% | — |
| ProofBench | 34% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1407 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 62.8 (#22), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 92.7% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 56% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1422 | — |
Multimodal Too close to call
Grok 4.7: 35.5 (#87), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1228 | 1180 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 32.5% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 20.8% | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Grok 4.7: 50.8 (#116), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1389 | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1455 | — |
| LMArena French | 1455 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1397 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1400 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Grok 4.7: 74.1 (#105), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1404 | 1397 |
Long Context Too close to call
Grok 4.7: 43.1 (#104), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1413 | 1404 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 70.0 (#24), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1399 | 1405 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | 1388 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1422 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2007 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.7 better than Hunyuan Vision 1.5?
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 4.7 or Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better for coding?
Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.0 versus 41.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 39 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9.