Model comparison

Grok 4.7 vs Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.7 xAI

53.1

Rank #37 Confirmed

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 Tencent

38.6

Rank #184 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 8 categories and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 4.7 leads 62.8 to 35.1.

Side by side

Grok 4.7 and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 specifications
Grok 4.7Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
ProviderxAITencent
Noometry Index53.138.6
Released2026-09-21—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window500K—
Max output500K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$6—
Results tracked3912

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 58.0 (#18), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Coding14271307
FrontierCode47.6%—
CursorBench46.3%—
LMArena WebDev1639—
FrontierSWE29.5%—
SciCode57.8%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 36.7 (#37), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
APEX-Agents54.6%—
GDP.pdf22.8%—
Vending-Bench 210,537—

Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 49.1 (#40), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Hard Prompts14131286
NYT Connections (extended)76.8%—
CritPt18%—
Chess Puzzles38%—
Mystery Game Puzzles29%—
DTBench96%—
LMCA49.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index153.53—

Math Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 57.8 (#39), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Math14071281
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)53%—
FrontierMath Tier 417.1%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.1%—
ProofBench34%—

Knowledge Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 62.8 (#22), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Expert14221276
GPQA Diamond92.7%—
SimpleQA Verified56%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 35.5 (#87), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Vision1228—
Blueprint-Bench 232.5%—
Furniture Assembly20.8%—

Multilingual Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 50.8 (#116), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Non-English13891265
LMArena Chinese14551346
LMArena Russian13971266
LMArena French1455—
LMArena Spanish1400—

Instruction Following Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 74.1 (#105), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Instruction Following14041277

Long Context Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 43.1 (#104), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Longer Query14131341

Writing & Preference Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 70.0 (#24), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Text13991288
LMArena Creative Writing13911264
LMArena Multi-Turn13931284
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2007—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.7 better than Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4.7 or Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.0 versus 38.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 39 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper