Model comparison

Grok 4.6 vs Nemotron-4 15B

Grok 4.6 has enough public results to be ranked (#19); Nemotron-4 15B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.6 xAI

56.8

Rank #19 Confirmed

Nemotron-4 15B NVIDIA

—

Unranked

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.

Side by side

Grok 4.6 and Nemotron-4 15B specifications
Grok 4.6Nemotron-4 15B
ProviderxAINVIDIA
Noometry Index56.8—
Released2026-08-122024-02-26
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window500K—
Max output500K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$6—
Results tracked498

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 58.0 (#14), Nemotron-4 15B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Nemotron-4 15B
DeepSWE67.5%—
FrontierCode48%—
CursorBench41.4%—
LMArena WebDev1620—
FrontierSWE25.3%—
SciCode56.5%—
WeirdML67.3%—
LMArena Coding1464—
ALE-Bench1,508—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 39.4 (#25), Nemotron-4 15B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Nemotron-4 15B
APEX-Agents65.3%—
GDP.pdf17.2%—
Vending-Bench 29,047—

Reasoning Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 61.3 (#18), Nemotron-4 15B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Nemotron-4 15B
Epoch Capabilities Index156.48107.38
ARC-AGI-267.1%—
SimpleBench75.9%—
NYT Connections (extended)80%—
ARC-AGI-187.5%—
CritPt19.7%—
Chess Puzzles40%—
EBR-Bench30.5%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1445—
Mystery Game Puzzles34%—
DTBench97.3%—
LMCA48.5%—
BIG-Bench Hard—58.7%
HellaSwag—82.4%
PIQA—82.4%
WinoGrande—78%

Math Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 66.8 (#19), Nemotron-4 15B: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Nemotron-4 15B
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)66%—
FrontierMath Tier 431.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202599.2%—
ProofBench51%—
LMArena Math1416—
GSM8K—46%

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 63.3 (#18), Nemotron-4 15B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Nemotron-4 15B
GPQA Diamond94%—
SimpleQA Verified49.3%—
LMArena Expert1463—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—55.5%
MMLU—58.7%

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 43.9 (#18), Nemotron-4 15B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Nemotron-4 15B
LMArena Vision1265—
Blueprint-Bench 233.2%—
Furniture Assembly40%—
LMArena Document1452—

Multilingual Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 53.3 (#67), Nemotron-4 15B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Nemotron-4 15B
LMArena Non-English1422—
LMArena Chinese1479—
LMArena French1458—
LMArena German1425—
LMArena Japanese1383—
LMArena Korean1395—
LMArena Russian1427—
LMArena Spanish1408—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 75.6 (#59), Nemotron-4 15B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Nemotron-4 15B
LMArena Instruction Following1431—

Long Context Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 44.4 (#62), Nemotron-4 15B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Nemotron-4 15B
LMArena Longer Query1453—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 62.5 (#77), Nemotron-4 15B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Nemotron-4 15B
LMArena Text1427—
LMArena Creative Writing1430—
LMArena Multi-Turn1422—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.6 better than Nemotron-4 15B?

Grok 4.6 has enough public results to be ranked (#19); Nemotron-4 15B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.6 and Nemotron-4 15B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Grok 4.6 has 49 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron-4 15B has 8.

Related comparisons

Go deeper