Model comparison

Grok 4.6 vs Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10

Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 38.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.6 xAI

56.8

Rank #19 Confirmed

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 Tencent

38.0

Rank #183 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.6 scores higher in 8 categories and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.6 leads 61.3 to 24.5.

Side by side

Grok 4.6 and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 specifications
Grok 4.6Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
ProviderxAITencent
Noometry Index56.838.0
Released2026-08-12—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window500K—
Max output500K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$6—
Results tracked4912

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 58.0 (#14), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 37.6 (#177)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Coding14641307
DeepSWE67.5%—
FrontierCode48%—
CursorBench41.4%—
LMArena WebDev1620—
FrontierSWE25.3%—
SciCode56.5%—
WeirdML67.3%—
ALE-Bench1,508—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 39.4 (#25), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
APEX-Agents65.3%—
GDP.pdf17.2%—
Vending-Bench 29,047—

Reasoning Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 61.3 (#18), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 24.5 (#147)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Hard Prompts14451286
ARC-AGI-267.1%—
SimpleBench75.9%—
NYT Connections (extended)80%—
ARC-AGI-187.5%—
CritPt19.7%—
Chess Puzzles40%—
EBR-Bench30.5%—
Mystery Game Puzzles34%—
DTBench97.3%—
LMCA48.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index156.48—

Math Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 66.8 (#19), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 33.1 (#178)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Math14161281
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)66%—
FrontierMath Tier 431.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202599.2%—
ProofBench51%—

Knowledge Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 63.3 (#18), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 34.5 (#188)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Expert14631276
GPQA Diamond94%—
SimpleQA Verified49.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 43.9 (#18), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Vision1265—
Blueprint-Bench 233.2%—
Furniture Assembly40%—
LMArena Document1452—

Multilingual Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 53.3 (#67), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.1 (#195)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Non-English14221265
LMArena Chinese14791346
LMArena Russian14271266
LMArena French1458—
LMArena German1425—
LMArena Japanese1383—
LMArena Korean1395—
LMArena Spanish1408—

Instruction Following Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 75.6 (#59), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.6 (#192)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Instruction Following14311277

Long Context Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 44.4 (#62), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#144)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Longer Query14531342

Writing & Preference Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 62.5 (#77), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.9 (#191)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Text14271288
LMArena Creative Writing14301264
LMArena Multi-Turn14221284

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.6 better than Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10?

Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 38.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4.6 or Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better for coding?

Grok 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.0 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.6 and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.6 has 49 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper