Noometry

Model comparison

Grok 4.5 vs Yi-1.5-34B

Grok 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 55.0 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.5 xAI

55.0

Rank #22 Confirmed

Yi-1.5-34B 01.AI

30.2

Rank #286 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.5 scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-1.5-34B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 4.5 leads 62.3 to 14.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 93.4% for Grok 4.5 and 32% for Yi-1.5-34B.
  • Yi-1.5-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4.5Yi-1.5-34B
ProviderxAI01.AI
Noometry Index55.030.2
Released2026-07-082024-05-13
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window500K—
Max output500K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$6—
Results tracked5221

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.5 leads

Grok 4.5: 51.7 (#34), Yi-1.5-34B: 31.9 (#267)

BenchmarkGrok 4.5Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Coding14731169
DeepSWE53.8%—
FrontierCode42.4%—
LMArena WebDev1552—
SciCode54.1%—
WeirdML46.4%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—33.9%
BigCodeBench Complete—43.8%
ALE-Bench1,309—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.5: 44.4 (#15), Yi-1.5-34B: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.5Yi-1.5-34B
APEX-Agents56.2%—
τ²-bench Banking47.9%—
PostTrainBench23.4%—
GBAEval65.4%—
GDP.pdf14%—
LMArena Search1213—
Vending-Bench 23,887—

Reasoning Grok 4.5 leads

Grok 4.5: 56.0 (#23), Yi-1.5-34B: 21.5 (#195)

BenchmarkGrok 4.5Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Hard Prompts14621160
ARC-AGI-252.6%—
SimpleBench70%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark83.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)79.9%—
ARC-AGI-187.2%—
CritPt15.4%—
Chess Puzzles36%—
DTBench96.5%—
LMCA45.2%—
Surface Evolver Bench74.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.02—

Math Grok 4.5 leads

Grok 4.5: 60.7 (#29), Yi-1.5-34B: 25.3 (#248)

BenchmarkGrok 4.5Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Math14571182
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)57.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 424.4%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.8%—
ProofBench31%—
MATH Level 5—25.5%

Knowledge Grok 4.5 leads

Grok 4.5: 62.3 (#21), Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#290)

BenchmarkGrok 4.5Yi-1.5-34B
GPQA Diamond93.4%32%
LMArena Expert14661144
SimpleQA Verified48.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.5: 37.8 (#63), Yi-1.5-34B: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.5Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Vision1287—
Blueprint-Bench 227.3%—
Furniture Assembly22.5%—
LMArena Document1452—

Multilingual Grok 4.5 leads

Grok 4.5: 54.5 (#43), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.5 (#251)

BenchmarkGrok 4.5Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Non-English14391121
LMArena Chinese14971213
LMArena French14581155
LMArena German14481111
LMArena Japanese14251021
LMArena Korean14021005
LMArena Russian14471091
LMArena Spanish14521120

Instruction Following Grok 4.5 leads

Grok 4.5: 76.3 (#45), Yi-1.5-34B: 59.4 (#252)

BenchmarkGrok 4.5Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Instruction Following14461139

Long Context Grok 4.5 leads

Grok 4.5: 44.8 (#54), Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#243)

BenchmarkGrok 4.5Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Longer Query14631144

Writing & Preference Grok 4.5 leads

Grok 4.5: 65.9 (#40), Yi-1.5-34B: 37.6 (#252)

BenchmarkGrok 4.5Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Text14481173
LMArena Creative Writing14421135
LMArena Multi-Turn14571153
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1579—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.5 better than Yi-1.5-34B?

Grok 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 55.0 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4.5 or Yi-1.5-34B better for coding?

Grok 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.7 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.5 and Yi-1.5-34B share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.5 has 52 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper