Model comparison

Grok 4.5 vs Molmo 2 8b

Grok 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 55.0 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.5 xAI

55.0

Rank #25 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.5 scores higher in 5 categories and Molmo 2 8b in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.5 leads 56.1 to 25.6.
  • Molmo 2 8b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4.5 and Molmo 2 8b specifications
Grok 4.5Molmo 2 8b
ProviderxAIAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index55.039.1
Released2026-07-08—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window500K—
Max output500K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$6—
Results tracked525

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Grok 4.5: 52.2 (#35), Molmo 2 8b: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Molmo 2 8b
DeepSWE53.8%—
FrontierCode42.4%—
LMArena WebDev1553—
SciCode54.1%—
WeirdML46.4%—
LMArena Coding1474—
ALE-Bench1,309—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.5: 44.4 (#17), Molmo 2 8b: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Molmo 2 8b
APEX-Agents56.2%—
τ²-bench Banking47.9%—
PostTrainBench23.4%—
GBAEval65.4%—
GDP.pdf14%—
LMArena Search1213—
Vending-Bench 23,887—

Reasoning Grok 4.5 leads

Grok 4.5: 56.1 (#25), Molmo 2 8b: 25.6 (#146)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Molmo 2 8b
LMArena Hard Prompts14621287
ARC-AGI-252.6%—
SimpleBench70%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark83.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)79.9%—
ARC-AGI-187.2%—
CritPt15.4%—
Chess Puzzles36%—
DTBench96.5%—
LMCA45.2%—
Surface Evolver Bench74.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index153.92—

Math Not comparable

Grok 4.5: 60.9 (#35), Molmo 2 8b: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Molmo 2 8b
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)57.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 424.4%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.8%—
ProofBench31%—
LMArena Math1459—

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok 4.5: 62.3 (#24), Molmo 2 8b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Molmo 2 8b
GPQA Diamond93.4%—
SimpleQA Verified48.3%—
LMArena Expert1466—

Multimodal Grok 4.5 leads

Grok 4.5: 37.6 (#72), Molmo 2 8b: 30.2 (#112)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Molmo 2 8b
LMArena Vision12881081
Blueprint-Bench 227.3%—
Furniture Assembly22.5%—
LMArena Document1452—

Multilingual Grok 4.5 leads

Grok 4.5: 54.4 (#42), Molmo 2 8b: 42.7 (#190)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Molmo 2 8b
LMArena Non-English14401276
LMArena Chinese1496—
LMArena French1456—
LMArena German1446—
LMArena Japanese1428—
LMArena Korean1404—
LMArena Russian1448—
LMArena Spanish1450—

Instruction Following Grok 4.5 leads

Grok 4.5: 76.0 (#48), Molmo 2 8b: 67.0 (#201)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Molmo 2 8b
LMArena Instruction Following14461270

Long Context Not comparable

Grok 4.5: 44.8 (#56), Molmo 2 8b: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Molmo 2 8b
LMArena Longer Query1463—

Writing & Preference Grok 4.5 leads

Grok 4.5: 65.8 (#42), Molmo 2 8b: 49.4 (#191)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Molmo 2 8b
LMArena Text14481288
LMArena Creative Writing1442—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1579—
LMArena Multi-Turn1456—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.5 better than Molmo 2 8b?

Grok 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 55.0 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.5 and Molmo 2 8b share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.5 has 52 scored results on Noometry and Molmo 2 8b has 5.

Related comparisons

Go deeper