Model comparison

Grok 4.5 vs Mercury

Grok 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 55.0 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.5 xAI

55.0

Rank #25 Confirmed

Mercury Inception

37.6

Rank #199 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.5 scores higher in 6 categories and Mercury in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.5 leads 56.1 to 17.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 83.5% for Grok 4.5 and 21.6% for Mercury.

Side by side

Grok 4.5 and Mercury specifications
Grok 4.5Mercury
ProviderxAIInception
Noometry Index55.037.6
Released2026-07-08—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window500K—
Max output500K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$6—
Results tracked529

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.5 leads

Grok 4.5: 52.2 (#35), Mercury: 38.7 (#170)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Mercury
LMArena Coding14741322
DeepSWE53.8%—
FrontierCode42.4%—
LMArena WebDev1553—
SciCode54.1%—
WeirdML46.4%—
ALE-Bench1,309—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.5: 44.4 (#17), Mercury: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Mercury
APEX-Agents56.2%—
τ²-bench Banking47.9%—
PostTrainBench23.4%—
GBAEval65.4%—
GDP.pdf14%—
LMArena Search1213—
Vending-Bench 23,887—

Reasoning Grok 4.5 leads

Grok 4.5: 56.1 (#25), Mercury: 17.5 (#293)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Mercury
Kagi LLM Benchmark83.5%21.6%
LMArena Hard Prompts14621285
ARC-AGI-252.6%—
SimpleBench70%—
NYT Connections (extended)79.9%—
ARC-AGI-187.2%—
CritPt15.4%—
Chess Puzzles36%—
DTBench96.5%—
LMCA45.2%—
Surface Evolver Bench74.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index153.92—

Math Not comparable

Grok 4.5: 60.9 (#35), Mercury: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Mercury
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)57.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 424.4%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.8%—
ProofBench31%—
LMArena Math1459—

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok 4.5: 62.3 (#24), Mercury: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Mercury
GPQA Diamond93.4%—
SimpleQA Verified48.3%—
LMArena Expert1466—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.5: 37.6 (#72), Mercury: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Mercury
LMArena Vision1288—
Blueprint-Bench 227.3%—
Furniture Assembly22.5%—
LMArena Document1452—

Multilingual Grok 4.5 leads

Grok 4.5: 54.4 (#42), Mercury: 41.6 (#206)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Mercury
LMArena Non-English14401260
LMArena Chinese1496—
LMArena French1456—
LMArena German1446—
LMArena Japanese1428—
LMArena Korean1404—
LMArena Russian1448—
LMArena Spanish1450—

Instruction Following Grok 4.5 leads

Grok 4.5: 76.0 (#48), Mercury: 65.2 (#224)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Mercury
LMArena Instruction Following14461239

Long Context Grok 4.5 leads

Grok 4.5: 44.8 (#56), Mercury: 38.4 (#198)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Mercury
LMArena Longer Query14631266

Writing & Preference Grok 4.5 leads

Grok 4.5: 65.8 (#42), Mercury: 46.2 (#221)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Mercury
LMArena Text14481282
LMArena Creative Writing14421191
LMArena Multi-Turn14561282
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1579—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.5 better than Mercury?

Grok 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 55.0 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4.5 or Mercury better for coding?

Grok 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.2 versus 38.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.5 and Mercury share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.5 has 52 scored results on Noometry and Mercury has 9.

Related comparisons

Go deeper