Model comparison

Grok 4.3 vs Molmo 2 8b

Grok 4.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.3 xAI

43.8

Rank #86 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.3 scores higher in 5 categories and Molmo 2 8b in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.3 leads 35.9 to 25.6.
  • Molmo 2 8b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4.3 and Molmo 2 8b specifications
Grok 4.3Molmo 2 8b
ProviderxAIAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index43.839.1
Released2026-04-17—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M—
Max output30K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$2.50—
Results tracked405

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Grok 4.3: 41.6 (#121), Molmo 2 8b: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Molmo 2 8b
LMArena WebDev1357—
SciCode47.3%—
WeirdML49.9%—
LMArena Coding1415—
ALE-Bench944.17—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.3: 27.7 (#99), Molmo 2 8b: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Molmo 2 8b
GDP.pdf8%—
LMArena Search1165—
Vending-Bench 235.26—

Reasoning Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 35.9 (#68), Molmo 2 8b: 25.6 (#146)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Molmo 2 8b
LMArena Hard Prompts13961287
NYT Connections (extended)55.2%—
CritPt8%—
Chess Puzzles25%—
DTBench90.7%—
LMCA38.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index149.16—
ForecastBench60.3—

Math Not comparable

Grok 4.3: 46.0 (#74), Molmo 2 8b: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Molmo 2 8b
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)42.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 414.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202593.3%—
ProofBench11%—
LMArena Math1388—

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok 4.3: 52.5 (#62), Molmo 2 8b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Molmo 2 8b
GPQA Diamond88.8%—
SimpleQA Verified33.2%—
LMArena Expert1385—

Multimodal Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 31.6 (#104), Molmo 2 8b: 30.2 (#112)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Molmo 2 8b
LMArena Vision12291081
Blueprint-Bench 20%—

Multilingual Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 50.5 (#120), Molmo 2 8b: 42.7 (#190)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Molmo 2 8b
LMArena Non-English13851276
LMArena Chinese1422—
LMArena French1412—
LMArena German1395—
LMArena Japanese1379—
LMArena Korean1356—
LMArena Russian1399—
LMArena Spanish1398—

Instruction Following Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 72.1 (#140), Molmo 2 8b: 67.0 (#201)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Molmo 2 8b
LMArena Instruction Following13661270

Long Context Not comparable

Grok 4.3: 42.5 (#123), Molmo 2 8b: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Molmo 2 8b
LMArena Longer Query1393—

Writing & Preference Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 58.5 (#118), Molmo 2 8b: 49.4 (#191)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Molmo 2 8b
LMArena Text13971288
LMArena Creative Writing1380—
EQ-Bench 41075—
LMArena Multi-Turn1406—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.3 better than Molmo 2 8b?

Grok 4.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.3 and Molmo 2 8b share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and Molmo 2 8b has 5.

Related comparisons

Go deeper