Model comparison
Grok 4.3 vs Kimi K2.6
Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.7 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 38 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 38 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.3 scores higher in 1 category and Kimi K2.6 in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.6 leads 57.0 to 46.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 55.2% for Grok 4.3 and 87.2% for Kimi K2.6.
- Grok 4.3 is cheaper at $1.25 / $2.50 per million input/output tokens, against $0.95 / $4 for Kimi K2.6.
- Grok 4.3 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
- Kimi K2.6 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok 4.3 | Kimi K2.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 47.7 |
| Released | 2026-04-17 | 2026-04-20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | 262K |
| Max output | 30K | 262K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.25 | $0.95 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $4 |
| Results tracked | 40 | 51 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2.6 leads
Grok 4.3: 41.6 (#121), Kimi K2.6: 50.7 (#43)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.3 | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1357 | 1509 |
| SciCode | 47.3% | 53.5% |
| WeirdML | 49.9% | 55.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1415 | 1488 |
| ALE-Bench | 944.17 | 1,093 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 76.7% |
Agentic & Tool Use Grok 4.3 leads
Grok 4.3: 27.7 (#99), Kimi K2.6: 21.9 (#137)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.3 | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | 8% | 12% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 35.26 | 6,205 |
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 4.6% |
| ExploitBench | — | 18.4% |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |
| LMArena Search | 1165 | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2.6 leads
Grok 4.3: 35.9 (#68), Kimi K2.6: 40.5 (#55)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.3 | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 55.2% | 87.2% |
| CritPt | 8% | 8% |
| Chess Puzzles | 25% | 26% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1396 | 1470 |
| DTBench | 90.7% | 90.9% |
| LMCA | 38.3% | 37.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 149.16 | 151.05 |
| EBR-Bench | — | 2.4% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| ForecastBench | 60.3 | — |
Math Kimi K2.6 leads
Grok 4.3: 46.0 (#74), Kimi K2.6: 57.0 (#41)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.3 | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 42.8% | 57.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 14.6% | 25.6% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 93.3% | 96.1% |
| ProofBench | 11% | 16% |
| LMArena Math | 1388 | 1475 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 72.9% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 39% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 14.6% |
Knowledge Kimi K2.6 leads
Grok 4.3: 52.5 (#62), Kimi K2.6: 54.0 (#54)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.3 | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 88.8% | 90.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 33.2% | 34.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1385 | 1491 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.8% |
Multimodal Too close to call
Grok 4.3: 31.6 (#104), Kimi K2.6: 31.6 (#103)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.3 | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1229 | 1283 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 0% | 3.9% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 21.7% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1451 |
Multilingual Kimi K2.6 leads
Grok 4.3: 50.5 (#120), Kimi K2.6: 54.9 (#37)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.3 | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1385 | 1446 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1422 | 1521 |
| LMArena French | 1412 | 1471 |
| LMArena German | 1395 | 1450 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1379 | 1443 |
| LMArena Korean | 1356 | 1427 |
| LMArena Russian | 1399 | 1446 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1398 | 1464 |
Instruction Following Kimi K2.6 leads
Grok 4.3: 72.1 (#140), Kimi K2.6: 76.3 (#43)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.3 | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1366 | 1451 |
Long Context Kimi K2.6 leads
Grok 4.3: 42.5 (#123), Kimi K2.6: 44.9 (#52)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.3 | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1393 | 1468 |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2.6 leads
Grok 4.3: 58.5 (#118), Kimi K2.6: 68.5 (#26)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.3 | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1397 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1380 | 1434 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1075 | 1202 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1406 | 1453 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1725 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.3 better than Kimi K2.6?
Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.7 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Grok 4.3 or Kimi K2.6?
Grok 4.3 is cheaper. It lists at $1.25 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Kimi K2.6 lists at $0.95 and $4.
Is Grok 4.3 or Kimi K2.6 better for coding?
Kimi K2.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.7 versus 41.6 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Grok 4.3 does, with 1M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.3 and Kimi K2.6 share?
38 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.6 has 51.