Model comparison

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent vs Yi-34B

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent xAI

46.2

Rank #65 Confirmed

Yi-34B 01.AI

27.8

Rank #329 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-34B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 40.4 to 7.5.
  • Yi-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and Yi-34B specifications
Grok 4.20 Multi-AgentYi-34B
ProviderxAI01.AI
Noometry Index46.227.8
Released2026-03-092023-11-02
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M—
Max output30K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$2.50—
Results tracked2023

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.0 (#92), Yi-34B: 32.3 (#274)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentYi-34B
LMArena Coding14571112

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —, Yi-34B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentYi-34B
LMArena Search1204—

Reasoning Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.9 (#48), Yi-34B: 21.2 (#226)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentYi-34B
LMArena Hard Prompts14481104
NYT Connections (extended)89.6%—
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index—117.39

Math Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.4 (#104), Yi-34B: 21.6 (#282)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentYi-34B
LMArena Math14421114
MATH Level 5—5.1%
GSM8K—76%

Knowledge Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.4 (#119), Yi-34B: 7.5 (#309)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentYi-34B
LMArena Expert14451061
GPQA Diamond—14.7%
MMLU—76.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.5 (#48), Yi-34B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentYi-34B
LMArena Vision1259—

Multilingual Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.4 (#43), Yi-34B: 29.7 (#264)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentYi-34B
LMArena Non-English14401079
LMArena Chinese14751176
LMArena French14661081
LMArena German14561042
LMArena Japanese1405993
LMArena Korean1416959
LMArena Russian14571050
LMArena Spanish14471070

Instruction Following Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 74.8 (#84), Yi-34B: 56.2 (#274)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentYi-34B
LMArena Instruction Following14201091

Long Context Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#88), Yi-34B: 33.2 (#264)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentYi-34B
LMArena Longer Query14311094

Writing & Preference Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.0 (#59), Yi-34B: 34.1 (#273)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentYi-34B
LMArena Text14501129
LMArena Creative Writing14361108
LMArena Multi-Turn14521113

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better than Yi-34B?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or Yi-34B better for coding?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and Yi-34B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper