Model comparison
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent vs Qwen3 Max
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 43.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen3 Max in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 43.9 to 22.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 89.6% for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and 30.1% for Qwen3 Max.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is cheaper at $1.25 / $2.50 per million input/output tokens, against $1.20 / $6 for Qwen3 Max.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
Side by side
| Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen3 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 46.2 | 43.7 |
| Released | 2026-03-09 | 2025-09-23 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | 262K |
| Max output | 30K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.25 | $1.20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $6 |
| Results tracked | 20 | 33 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.0 (#92), Qwen3 Max: 43.0 (#93)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1457 | 1456 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 370.45 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —, Qwen3 Max: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1204 | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 71.56 |
Reasoning Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.9 (#48), Qwen3 Max: 22.6 (#190)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 89.6% | 30.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1448 | 1448 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 72.5% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 5% |
| DTBench | — | 82.1% |
| LMCA | — | 28.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 142.38 |
Math Too close to call
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.4 (#104), Qwen3 Max: 38.7 (#131)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1442 | 1446 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 18.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 73.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 97.1% |
Knowledge Qwen3 Max leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.4 (#119), Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#78)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1445 | 1455 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 72.6% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 48.7% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.5 (#48), Qwen3 Max: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1259 | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.4 (#43), Qwen3 Max: 53.7 (#62)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1440 | 1429 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1475 | 1478 |
| LMArena French | 1466 | 1449 |
| LMArena German | 1456 | 1463 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1405 | 1397 |
| LMArena Korean | 1416 | 1399 |
| LMArena Russian | 1457 | 1428 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1447 | 1462 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 74.8 (#84), Qwen3 Max: 74.8 (#87)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1419 |
Long Context Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#88), Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#134)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1431 | 1438 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| CL-bench | — | 14.5% |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.0 (#59), Qwen3 Max: 62.4 (#76)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1450 | 1439 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1436 | 1402 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1452 | 1446 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better than Qwen3 Max?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 43.7 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or Qwen3 Max?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is cheaper. It lists at $1.25 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Max lists at $1.20 and $6.
Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or Qwen3 Max better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (43.0 vs 43.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.
Which has the bigger context window?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent does, with 1M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and Qwen3 Max share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.