Model comparison

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent vs Qwen3 14B

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 35.5 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 14B costs 2.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent xAI

46.2

Rank #65 Confirmed

Qwen3 14B Alibaba (Qwen)

35.5

Rank #225 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 43.9 to 18.5.
  • Qwen3 14B is cheaper at $0.35 / $1.40 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $2.50 for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent.
  • Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 131K.
  • Qwen3 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and Qwen3 14B specifications
Grok 4.20 Multi-AgentQwen3 14B
ProviderxAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index46.235.5
Released2026-03-092025-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M131K
Max output30K8K
Input $ / M tokens$1.25$0.35
Output $ / M tokens$2.50$1.40
Results tracked2012

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.0 (#92), Qwen3 14B: 37.3 (#195)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentQwen3 14B
SciCode—31.6%
LMArena Coding1457—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —, Qwen3 14B: 29.6 (#83)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentQwen3 14B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—41%
LMArena Search1204—

Reasoning Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.9 (#48), Qwen3 14B: 18.5 (#280)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentQwen3 14B
Kagi LLM Benchmark—49.1%
NYT Connections (extended)89.6%—
CritPt—0%
Chess Puzzles—4%
LMArena Hard Prompts1448—
DTBench—64%
LMCA—18.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—138.23

Math Too close to call

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.4 (#104), Qwen3 14B: 38.6 (#133)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentQwen3 14B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—66.4%
LMArena Math1442—

Knowledge Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.4 (#119), Qwen3 14B: 39.3 (#134)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentQwen3 14B
GPQA Diamond—63.8%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.4%
LMArena Expert1445—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.5 (#48), Qwen3 14B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentQwen3 14B
LMArena Vision1259—

Multilingual Not comparable

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.4 (#43), Qwen3 14B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentQwen3 14B
LMArena Non-English1440—
LMArena Chinese1475—
LMArena French1466—
LMArena German1456—
LMArena Japanese1405—
LMArena Korean1416—
LMArena Russian1457—
LMArena Spanish1447—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 74.8 (#84), Qwen3 14B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentQwen3 14B
LMArena Instruction Following1420—

Long Context Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#88), Qwen3 14B: 38.1 (#204)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentQwen3 14B
Fiction.LiveBench—62.5%
LMArena Longer Query1431—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.0 (#59), Qwen3 14B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentQwen3 14B
LMArena Text1450—
LMArena Creative Writing1436—
LMArena Multi-Turn1452—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better than Qwen3 14B?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 35.5 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 14B costs 2.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or Qwen3 14B?

Qwen3 14B is cheaper. It lists at $0.35 per million input tokens and $1.40 per million output tokens; Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent lists at $1.25 and $2.50.

Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or Qwen3 14B better for coding?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 37.3 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent does, with 1M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and Qwen3 14B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 14B has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper