Model comparison
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 43.9 to 25.9.
Side by side
| Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 46.2 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2026-03-09 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 30K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.25 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.0 (#92), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1457 | 1314 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1204 | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.9 (#48), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1448 | 1299 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 89.6% | — |
Math Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.4 (#104), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1442 | 1298 |
Knowledge Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.4 (#119), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1445 | 1289 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.5 (#48), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1259 | — |
Multilingual Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.4 (#43), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1440 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1475 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 1456 | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1405 | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | 1457 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1466 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1416 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1447 | — |
Instruction Following Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 74.8 (#84), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1275 |
Long Context Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#88), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1431 | 1292 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.0 (#59), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1450 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1436 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1452 | 1299 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.