Model comparison

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent vs o3-pro

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent xAI

46.2

Rank #65 Confirmed

o3-pro OpenAI

42.9

Rank #105 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in long context, where o3-pro leads 72.2 to 43.7.
  • Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is cheaper at $1.25 / $2.50 per million input/output tokens, against $20 / $80 for o3-pro.
  • Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 200K.

Side by side

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and o3-pro specifications
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agento3-pro
ProviderxAIOpenAI
Noometry Index46.242.9
Released2026-03-092025-06-10
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M200K
Max output30K100K
Input $ / M tokens$1.25$20
Output $ / M tokens$2.50$80
Results tracked2012

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o3-pro leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.0 (#92), o3-pro: 55.5 (#24)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-Agento3-pro
Aider Polyglot—84.9%
WeirdML—58.2%
LMArena Coding1457—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —, o3-pro: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-Agento3-pro
LMArena Search1204—

Reasoning Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.9 (#48), o3-pro: 23.8 (#171)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-Agento3-pro
ARC-AGI-2—4.9%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—72.1%
NYT Connections (extended)89.6%—
ARC-AGI-1—59.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1448—
DTBench—86.9%
LMCA—38.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—147.42

Math Not comparable

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.4 (#104), o3-pro: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-Agento3-pro
LMArena Math1442—

Knowledge Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.4 (#119), o3-pro: 29.5 (#238)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-Agento3-pro
Confabulations—14.2%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—23.3%
LMArena Expert1445—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.5 (#48), o3-pro: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-Agento3-pro
LMArena Vision1259—

Multilingual Not comparable

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.4 (#43), o3-pro: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-Agento3-pro
LMArena Non-English1440—
LMArena Chinese1475—
LMArena French1466—
LMArena German1456—
LMArena Japanese1405—
LMArena Korean1416—
LMArena Russian1457—
LMArena Spanish1447—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 74.8 (#84), o3-pro: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-Agento3-pro
LMArena Instruction Following1420—

Long Context o3-pro leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#88), o3-pro: 72.2 (#1)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-Agento3-pro
Fiction.LiveBench—97.2%
LMArena Longer Query1431—

Writing & Preference Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.0 (#59), o3-pro: 57.1 (#133)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-Agento3-pro
LMArena Text1450—
LMArena Creative Writing1436—
Short-Story Creative Writing—84.4%
LMArena Multi-Turn1452—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better than o3-pro?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or o3-pro?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is cheaper. It lists at $1.25 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; o3-pro lists at $20 and $80.

Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or o3-pro better for coding?

o3-pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 43.0 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent does, with 1M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and o3-pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20 scored results on Noometry and o3-pro has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper