Model comparison

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent vs Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.5 to 39.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent xAI

45.5

Rank #62 Confirmed

Grok 4 Fast xAI

39.0

Rank #164 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher in 7 categories and Grok 4 Fast in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 42.4 to 22.5.

Side by side

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and Grok 4 Fast specifications
Grok 4.20 Multi-AgentGrok 4 Fast
ProviderxAIxAI
Noometry Index45.539.0
Released2026-03-092025-09-19
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output30K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$2.50—
Results tracked2030

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 42.4 (#91), Grok 4 Fast: 32.3 (#264)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Coding14581429
LMArena WebDev—1160
WeirdML—42.9%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —, Grok 4 Fast: 29.3 (#80)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Search12041171
τ²-bench Banking—15.7%
Cybench—30%

Reasoning Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 42.4 (#44), Grok 4 Fast: 22.5 (#179)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Hard Prompts14481413
ARC-AGI-2—5.3%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—66.1%
NYT Connections (extended)89.6%—
ARC-AGI-1—48.5%
DTBench—82.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index—144.21
ForecastBench—60.5

Math Too close to call

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 36.6 (#106), Grok 4 Fast: 36.1 (#126)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Math14411419

Knowledge Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.7 (#116), Grok 4 Fast: 31.5 (#211)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Expert14451411
Vectara Hallucination Rate—19.7%

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.8 (#44), Grok 4 Fast: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Vision1259—

Multilingual Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.6 (#40), Grok 4 Fast: 51.5 (#106)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Non-English14401397
LMArena Chinese14751458
LMArena French14671433
LMArena German14561383
LMArena Japanese14051358
LMArena Korean14161359
LMArena Russian14571387
LMArena Spanish14471414

Instruction Following Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 75.0 (#80), Grok 4 Fast: 73.4 (#116)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Instruction Following14201388

Long Context Grok 4 Fast leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#84), Grok 4 Fast: 63.2 (#3)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Longer Query14301415
Fiction.LiveBench—94.4%

Writing & Preference Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.1 (#57), Grok 4 Fast: 60.2 (#96)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Text14501407
LMArena Creative Writing14351388
LMArena Multi-Turn14511414

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better than Grok 4 Fast?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.5 to 39.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or Grok 4 Fast better for coding?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and Grok 4 Fast share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4 Fast has 30.

Related comparisons

Go deeper