Model comparison
Grok 4.1 vs Wizardlm 13b
Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.1 scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.1 leads 62.4 to 30.5.
- Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok 4.1 | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2025-11-17 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 33.7 (#253), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1445 | 1035 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1214 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok 4.1: 34.1 (#49), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 39% | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 29.5 (#91), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1435 | 1018 |
Math Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#120), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1422 | 1017 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Grok 4.1: 39.5 (#133), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1417 | — |
Multilingual Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 53.4 (#68), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1425 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1448 | — |
| LMArena German | 1446 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1397 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1438 | — |
Instruction Following Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 73.8 (#111), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1400 | 1048 |
Long Context Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#100), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 62.4 (#75), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1411 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1437 | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.1 better than Wizardlm 13b?
Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 4.1 or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
Grok 4.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.7 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.1 and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.