Model comparison

Grok 4.1 vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.1 xAI

41.5

Rank #134 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.1 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct in 1 category; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where Grok 4.1 leads 34.1 to 23.9.
  • Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4.1 and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct specifications
Grok 4.1Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
ProviderxAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index41.538.1
Released2025-11-172025-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked1925

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Grok 4.1: 33.7 (#253), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 35.5 (#223)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena WebDev12141275
LMArena Coding14451412
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—55.4%
GSO—4.9%
WeirdML—41.2%
ALE-Bench—461.45
AlgoTune—1.44

Agentic & Tool Use Grok 4.1 leads

Grok 4.1: 34.1 (#49), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.9 (#123)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Terminal-Bench—27.2%
Cybench39%—

Reasoning Grok 4.1 leads

Grok 4.1: 29.5 (#91), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 25.5 (#149)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14351372
Kagi LLM Benchmark—49.5%

Math Grok 4.1 leads

Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#120), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.6 (#150)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Math14221365

Knowledge Grok 4.1 leads

Grok 4.1: 39.5 (#133), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.0 (#162)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Expert14171338

Multilingual Grok 4.1 leads

Grok 4.1: 53.4 (#68), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.7 (#148)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Non-English14251346
LMArena Chinese14651357
LMArena French14481398
LMArena German14461325
LMArena Japanese13971310
LMArena Korean14071305
LMArena Russian14341366
LMArena Spanish14381360

Instruction Following Grok 4.1 leads

Grok 4.1: 73.8 (#111), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.6 (#147)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14001355

Long Context Grok 4.1 leads

Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#100), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#131)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14161378

Writing & Preference Grok 4.1 leads

Grok 4.1: 62.4 (#75), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.3 (#147)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Text14371357
LMArena Creative Writing14111333
LMArena Multi-Turn14371365

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.1 better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4.1 or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.5 versus 33.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.1 and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper