Model comparison
Grok 4.1 vs o3-pro
o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in long context, where o3-pro leads 72.2 to 43.2.
Side by side
| Grok 4.1 | o3-pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 42.9 |
| Released | 2025-11-17 | 2025-06-10 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $80 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o3-pro leads
Grok 4.1: 33.7 (#253), o3-pro: 55.5 (#24)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 84.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1214 | — |
| WeirdML | — | 58.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1445 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok 4.1: 34.1 (#49), o3-pro: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 39% | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 29.5 (#91), o3-pro: 23.8 (#171)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 4.9% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 72.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 59.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1435 | — |
| DTBench | — | 86.9% |
| LMCA | — | 38.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.42 |
Math Not comparable
Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#120), o3-pro: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1422 | — |
Knowledge Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 39.5 (#133), o3-pro: 29.5 (#238)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Confabulations | — | 14.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1417 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Grok 4.1: 53.4 (#68), o3-pro: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1425 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | — |
| LMArena French | 1448 | — |
| LMArena German | 1446 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1397 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1438 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Grok 4.1: 73.8 (#111), o3-pro: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1400 | — |
Long Context o3-pro leads
Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#100), o3-pro: 72.2 (#1)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 97.2% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | — |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 62.4 (#75), o3-pro: 57.1 (#133)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1411 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 84.4% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1437 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.1 better than o3-pro?
o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 4.1 or o3-pro better for coding?
o3-pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 33.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.1 and o3-pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and o3-pro has 12.