Model comparison
Grok 4.1 vs Mistral Medium 3.1
Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.1 leads 29.5 to 10.6.
Side by side
| Grok 4.1 | Mistral Medium 3.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 31.9 |
| Released | 2025-11-17 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 105K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Grok 4.1: 33.7 (#253), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1214 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1445 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok 4.1: 34.1 (#49), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 39% | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 29.5 (#91), Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.6 (#341)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 6.5% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 20.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1435 | — |
Math Not comparable
Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#120), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1422 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Grok 4.1: 39.5 (#133), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1417 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Grok 4.1: 53.4 (#68), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1425 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | — |
| LMArena French | 1448 | — |
| LMArena German | 1446 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1397 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1438 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Grok 4.1: 73.8 (#111), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1400 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#100), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | — |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 62.4 (#75), Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.5 (#145)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1411 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1476 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1437 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.1 better than Mistral Medium 3.1?
Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.1 and Mistral Medium 3.1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3.