Model comparison
Grok 4.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
MiniMaxSummary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.1 scores higher in 6 categories and MiniMax-M2.7 in 3 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Grok 4.1 leads 38.9 to 25.9.
- MiniMax-M2.7 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok 4.1 | MiniMax-M2.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 37.7 |
| Released | 2025-11-17 | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 205K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 30 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiniMax-M2.7 leads
Grok 4.1: 33.7 (#253), MiniMax-M2.7: 41.8 (#120)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1214 | 1398 |
| LMArena Coding | 1445 | 1454 |
| SciCode | — | 47% |
| WeirdML | — | 37% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 599.25 |
Agentic & Tool Use Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 34.1 (#49), MiniMax-M2.7: 25.1 (#111)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 45.1% |
| Cybench | 39% | — |
| ExploitBench | — | 13.3% |
| GBAEval | — | 0% |
Reasoning Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 29.5 (#91), MiniMax-M2.7: 19.7 (#253)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1435 | 1422 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 24.7% |
| CritPt | — | 0.6% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 39.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 145.85 |
Math Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#120), MiniMax-M2.7: 25.9 (#263)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1422 | 1420 |
| ProofBench | — | 3% |
Knowledge Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 39.5 (#133), MiniMax-M2.7: 37.7 (#152)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1417 | 1444 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.9% |
Multilingual Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 53.4 (#68), MiniMax-M2.7: 50.3 (#123)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1425 | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1441 |
| LMArena French | 1448 | 1421 |
| LMArena German | 1446 | 1398 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1397 | 1262 |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | 1313 |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | 1383 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1438 | 1403 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Grok 4.1: 73.8 (#111), MiniMax-M2.7: 74.1 (#103)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1400 | 1405 |
Long Context Too close to call
Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#100), MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#99)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | 1419 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 62.4 (#75), MiniMax-M2.7: 58.9 (#112)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | 1405 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1411 | 1354 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1437 | 1412 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.1 better than MiniMax-M2.7?
Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 4.1 or MiniMax-M2.7 better for coding?
MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 33.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.1 and MiniMax-M2.7 share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.7 has 30.