Model comparison
Grok 4.1 Fast vs Mistral Small 3.2
Grok 4.1 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small 3.2 costs 2.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.1 Fast's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Grok 4.1 Fast scores higher in 4 categories and Mistral Small 3.2 in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.1 Fast leads 43.4 to 18.1.
- Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper at $0.0938 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $0.20 / $0.50 for Grok 4.1 Fast.
- Mistral Small 3.2 accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 128K.
- Mistral Small 3.2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok 4.1 Fast | Mistral Small 3.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 41.4 | 31.2 |
| Released | 2025-06-27 | 2025-06-20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 128K | 256K |
| Max output | 30K | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.20 | $0.0938 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.50 | $0.25 |
| Results tracked | 32 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Grok 4.1 Fast: 34.1 (#245), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 Fast | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1242 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1411 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 394.93 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok 4.1 Fast: 36.3 (#39), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 Fast | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 69.6% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 13.1% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1171 | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 1,107 | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.1 Fast leads
Grok 4.1 Fast: 43.4 (#49), Mistral Small 3.2: 18.1 (#287)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 Fast | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 56% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 40.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 87.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1407 | — |
| DTBench | 87.7% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 131.74 |
| ForecastBench | 61 | — |
Math Grok 4.1 Fast leads
Grok 4.1 Fast: 31.9 (#221), Mistral Small 3.2: 26.3 (#260)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 Fast | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 60.9% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 30.3% |
| ProofBench | 4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1408 | — |
Knowledge Grok 4.1 Fast leads
Grok 4.1 Fast: 33.1 (#207), Mistral Small 3.2: 26.7 (#256)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 Fast | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 49.1% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 17.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1399 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok 4.1 Fast: 37.0 (#76), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 Fast | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1201 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Grok 4.1 Fast: 51.0 (#114), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 Fast | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1391 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1441 | — |
| LMArena French | 1415 | — |
| LMArena German | 1404 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1349 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1361 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1387 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1413 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Grok 4.1 Fast: 72.7 (#133), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 Fast | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1376 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Grok 4.1 Fast: 42.4 (#126), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 Fast | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1390 | — |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.1 Fast leads
Grok 4.1 Fast: 57.2 (#131), Mistral Small 3.2: 45.0 (#224)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 Fast | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1327 | 1255 |
| LMArena Text | 1408 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1394 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1389 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.1 Fast better than Mistral Small 3.2?
Grok 4.1 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small 3.2 costs 2.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.1 Fast's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Grok 4.1 Fast or Mistral Small 3.2?
Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper. It lists at $0.0938 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; Grok 4.1 Fast lists at $0.20 and $0.50.
Which has the bigger context window?
Mistral Small 3.2 does, with 256K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.1 Fast and Mistral Small 3.2 share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Grok 4.1 Fast has 32 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.2 has 6.