Model comparison
Grok 4.1 Fast vs Mistral Small
Grok 4.1 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 22 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.1 Fast scores higher in 10 categories and Mistral Small in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.1 Fast leads 43.4 to 19.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard: 69.6% for Grok 4.1 Fast and 37.1% for Mistral Small.
- Both cost about the same: $0.20 input and $0.50 output per million tokens.
- Mistral Small accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.
- Mistral Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok 4.1 Fast | Mistral Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 41.4 | 33.4 |
| Released | 2025-06-27 | 2024-02-26 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 128K | 262K |
| Max output | 30K | 256K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.20 | $0.15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.50 | $0.60 |
| Results tracked | 32 | 39 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Grok 4.1 Fast: 34.1 (#245), Mistral Small: 34.0 (#247)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 Fast | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1411 | 1362 |
| ALE-Bench | 394.93 | 497.62 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1242 | — |
| SciCode | — | 26.5% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 36.1% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 36.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 46.6% |
Agentic & Tool Use Grok 4.1 Fast leads
Grok 4.1 Fast: 36.3 (#39), Mistral Small: 28.1 (#93)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 Fast | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 69.6% | 37.1% |
| τ²-bench Banking | 13.1% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1171 | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 1,107 | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.1 Fast leads
Grok 4.1 Fast: 43.4 (#49), Mistral Small: 19.8 (#250)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 Fast | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1407 | 1335 |
| DTBench | 87.7% | 70.9% |
| SimpleBench | 56% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 37.8% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 87.4% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 44.8% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 53.7% |
| LMCA | — | 20.6% |
| ForecastBench | 61 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 44% |
Math Grok 4.1 Fast leads
Grok 4.1 Fast: 31.9 (#221), Mistral Small: 16.4 (#293)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 Fast | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1408 | 1341 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 60.9% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 5.8% |
| ProofBench | 4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 39.9% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 46.8% |
Knowledge Grok 4.1 Fast leads
Grok 4.1 Fast: 33.1 (#207), Mistral Small: 31.0 (#222)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 Fast | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 17.8% | 5.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1399 | 1291 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 47.5% |
| MMLU | — | 68.7% |
Multimodal Grok 4.1 Fast leads
Grok 4.1 Fast: 37.0 (#76), Mistral Small: 33.5 (#96)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 Fast | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1201 | 1142 |
Multilingual Grok 4.1 Fast leads
Grok 4.1 Fast: 51.0 (#114), Mistral Small: 45.5 (#169)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 Fast | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1391 | 1315 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1441 | 1340 |
| LMArena French | 1415 | 1337 |
| LMArena German | 1404 | 1340 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1349 | 1275 |
| LMArena Korean | 1361 | 1259 |
| LMArena Russian | 1387 | 1324 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1413 | 1346 |
Instruction Following Grok 4.1 Fast leads
Grok 4.1 Fast: 72.7 (#133), Mistral Small: 66.4 (#209)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 Fast | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1376 | 1310 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 63.7% |
Long Context Grok 4.1 Fast leads
Grok 4.1 Fast: 42.4 (#126), Mistral Small: 40.4 (#156)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 Fast | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1390 | 1327 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.1 Fast leads
Grok 4.1 Fast: 57.2 (#131), Mistral Small: 52.5 (#171)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 Fast | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1408 | 1338 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1394 | 1305 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1389 | 1344 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1327 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 30.5% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.1 Fast better than Mistral Small?
Grok 4.1 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Grok 4.1 Fast or Mistral Small?
Mistral Small is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Grok 4.1 Fast lists at $0.20 and $0.50.
Is Grok 4.1 Fast or Mistral Small better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (34.1 vs 34.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.
Which has the bigger context window?
Mistral Small does, with 262K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.1 Fast and Mistral Small share?
22 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.1 Fast has 32 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small has 39.